Works matching DE "RELIGION %26 law"
1
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
2
- Politicka Misao: Croatian Political Science Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
3
- Clinical Law Review, 2018, v. 25, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
5
- Social Alternatives, 1990, v. 9, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
6
- International Journal, 2004, v. 59, n. 4, p. 902, doi. 10.1177/002070200405900414
- Article
7
- Review of English Studies, 2021, v. 72, n. 306, p. 663, doi. 10.1093/res/hgab011
- Article
8
- Political Quarterly, 1989, v. 60, n. 3, p. 280, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1989.tb00773.x
- Article
9
- Peace & Change, 2006, v. 31, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0130.2006.00347.x
- Article
10
- International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2004, v. 8, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1023/B:IJHA.0000043697.57999.d0
- Article
13
- Studies in Judaism, Humanities & the Social Sciences, 2018, v. 2, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.26613/sjhss/2.1.28
- Article
16
- Government & Opposition, 2007, v. 42, n. 3, p. 394, doi. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00229.x
- Article
18
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2018, v. 7, n. 2, p. 313, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwy034
- Article
19
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2017, v. 6, n. 2, p. 293, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwx002
- Article
21
- 2015
- Slotte, Pamela;
- Årsheim, Helge
- Essay
22
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 278, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt016
- Article
23
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 482, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt021
- Article
24
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 1, p. 98, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt001
- Article
25
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 1, p. 175, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rws067
- Article
26
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2012, v. 1, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rws033
- Durham, C.;
- Evans, M.;
- Ferrari, S.;
- Petkoff, P.;
- Robbers, G.;
- Rivers, J.
- Article
27
- Modern Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12059
- Article
28
- Modern Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 1, p. 110, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12058
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1069
- Article
34
- Southern Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
35
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2020, v. 44, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
36
- Journal of Law & Society, 2015, v. 42, n. 3, p. 460, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00719.x
- Article
37
- Journal of Law & Society, 2009, v. 36, n. 3, p. 301, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00469.x
- Article
38
- Journal of Law & Society, 2006, v. 33, n. 4, p. 596, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x
- Article
40
- Political Science Reviewer, 2009, v. 38, p. 76
- Article
41
- Political Science Reviewer, 2010, v. 39, p. 206
- Article
42
- Political Science Reviewer, 2009, v. 38, p. 31
- Article
43
- Political Science Reviewer, 2009, v. 38, p. 5
- Article
44
- Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 2013, v. 56, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
45
- Sur: International Journal on Human Rights / Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 2008, v. 5, n. 8, p. 60, doi. 10.1590/S1806-64452008000100004
- Article
47
- Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 2017, v. 22, n. 1, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/0969725X.2017.1286000
- Article
48
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1617
- Article
49
- Touro Law Review, 2023, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1029
- Article
50
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 1, p. 133
- Article