Works matching DE "RELIABILITY of eyewitness identification"
1
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 702, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2143
- McWilliams, Kelly;
- Harris, Latonya S.;
- Goodman, Gail S.
- Article
2
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 732, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2145
- Chae, Yoojin;
- Kulkofsky, Sarah;
- Debaran, Francisco;
- Wang, Qi;
- Hart, Sybil L.
- Article
3
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2013, v. 31, n. 5, p. 637, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2080
- Houston, Kate A.;
- Hope, Lorraine;
- Memon, Amina;
- Don Read, J.
- Article
4
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2013, v. 31, n. 5, p. 593, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2090
- LaPaglia, Jessica A.;
- Chan, Jason C. K.
- Article
5
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2013, v. 31, n. 5, p. 624, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2082
- Sagana, Anna;
- Sauerland, Melanie;
- Merckelbach, Harald
- Article
6
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2013, v. 31, n. 5, p. 531, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2095
- Otgaar, Henry;
- Sauerland, Melanie;
- Petrila, John P.
- Article
7
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 143, doi. 10.3758/PBR.17.2.143
- Article
8
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 105, n. 4, p. 947
- KAPLAN, ALIZA B.;
- PURACAL, JANIS C.
- Article
9
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 105, n. 4, p. 993
- Article
10
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 105, n. 4, p. 753
- Article
11
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2018, v. 32, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1002/acp.3401
- Charman, Steve D.;
- Carol, Rolando N.;
- Schwartz, Shari L.
- Article
12
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 30, doi. 10.1002/acp.2951
- Jack, Fiona;
- Leov, Jessica;
- Zajac, Rachel
- Article
13
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/acp.2950
- LaPaglia, Jessica A.;
- Wilford, Miko M.;
- Rivard, Jillian R.;
- Chan, Jason C. K.;
- Fisher, Ronald P.
- Article
14
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.1002/acp.2953
- Bowles, Peter V.;
- Sharman, Stefanie J.
- Article
15
- National Institute of Justice Journal, 2012, n. 270, p. 32
- Article
16
- National Institute of Justice Journal, 2012, n. 270, p. 30
- Article
17
- Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling, 2014, v. 11, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1002/jip.1398
- Sharps, Matthew Joseph;
- Herrera, Megan R.;
- Price‐Sharps, Jana Leigh
- Article
18
- Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2012, v. 40, n. 3, p. 197, doi. 10.1111/papa.12000
- ENOCH, DAVID;
- SPECTRE, LEVI;
- FISHER, TALIA
- Article
19
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1769
- Article
20
- New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1249
- Article
21
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2015, v. 32, n. 4, p. 865
- Denholtz, Tracy L.;
- McDonough, Emily A.
- Article
22
- Tennessee Law Review, 2015, v. 82, n. 4, p. 975
- Article
23
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 2, p. 331
- Article
25
- Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, p. 1, doi. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00713
- Alho, Laura;
- Soares, Sandra C.;
- Costa, Liliana P.;
- Pinto, Elisa;
- Ferreira, Jacqueline H. T.;
- Sorjonen, Kimmo;
- Silva, Carlos F.;
- Olsson, Mats J.
- Article
26
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2020, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 3, p. 101
- Article
28
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 769
- Davis, Deborah;
- Loftus, Elizabeth F.
- Article
29
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2020, v. 63, p. 357
- Article
30
- Texas Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 7, p. 1811
- Article
31
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
32
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
33
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 3, p. 511
- Article
34
- Georgia Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 3, p. 723
- Article
35
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 6, p. 821, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2014.978248
- Article
36
- Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, p. 1, doi. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01349
- Nyman, Thomas J.;
- Antfolk, Jan;
- Lampinen, James Michael;
- Korkman, Julia;
- Santtila, Pekka
- Article
37
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 2, p. 177, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113
- Jones, Angela M.;
- Penrod, Steven
- Article
38
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2011, v. 39, n. 1, p. 97
- Article
39
- Emory Law Journal, 2013, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1205
- Article
40
- Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1415
- Article
41
- Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 2014, v. 33, n. 6, p. 495, doi. 10.1521/jscp.2014.33.6.495
- Rounding, Kevin;
- Jacobson, Jill A.;
- Lindsay, R. C. L.
- Article
42
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 8, p. 1535
- Article
44
- Oregon Law Review, 2015, v. 94, n. 2, p. 295
- Article
45
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 357
- Article
46
- Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 44, n. 1, p. 151
- MacLean, Charles E.;
- Berles, James;
- Lamparello, Adam
- Article
47
- Utah Bar Journal, 2021, v. 34, n. 3, p. 18
- Article
48
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 3, p. 1090
- Article
49
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2017, v. 20, n. 3, p. 509
- McNabb, Neal S.;
- Farrell, Brian R.;
- Brown, Carlee R.
- Article
50
- Journal of Crime & Justice, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 243, doi. 10.1080/0735648X.2014.940999
- Rose, Chris;
- Beck, Victoria
- Article