Works matching DE "REGENTS of the University of California v. Bakke"
1
- Journal of Teacher Education, 1978, v. 29, n. 4, p. 3
- Article
2
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 409
- Article
3
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 369
- Article
4
- California Law Review, 2020, v. 108, n. 5, p. 1423, doi. 10.15779/Z38NZ80Q8S
- Article
5
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2003, v. 7, n. 2, p. 313
- Article
6
- St. John's Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 2/3, p. 499
- GREGORY, DAVID L.;
- MANNIX, SARAH
- Article
7
- Change, 2003, v. 35, n. 3, p. 34
- Article
8
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
9
- American Business Law Journal, 1979, v. 17, n. 2, p. 230, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1979.tb00579.x
- Article
10
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 427
- Article
13
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2001, v. 52, n. 1, p. 339
- Article
14
- Denver University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 4, p. 791
- Article
15
- Denver University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 4, p. 683
- Article
16
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022, v. 50, n. 3, p. 619, doi. 10.1017/jme.2022.102
- Article
17
- Journal of Higher Education, 2012, v. 83, n. 4, p. 497, doi. 10.1080/00221546.2012.11777255
- Article
18
- Review of Higher Education, 2019, v. 42, p. 135, doi. 10.1353/rhe.2019.0048
- Article
19
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2012, v. 42, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
20
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 3, p. 519
- Article
21
- Albany Law Review, 2009, v. 72, n. 4, p. 863
- Article
23
- South Carolina Law Review, 2013, v. 65, n. 2, p. 503
- Article
24
- Tulane Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 947
- Article
25
- Tulane Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
26
- Western Journal of Speech Communication: WJSC, 1979, v. 43, n. 4, p. 271, doi. 10.1080/10570317909373978
- Article
27
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 191, doi. 10.2307/3480094
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 143, doi. 10.2307/3480092
- Article
29
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 131, doi. 10.2307/3480091
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.2307/3480090
- Article
31
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.2307/3480089
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.2307/3480088
- Article
33
- California Law Review, 1979, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
35
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 2, p. 273
- Article
36
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2018, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1145
- Article
37
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2024, v. 29, n. 2, p. 290
- de Sousa, Monica Teixeira
- Article
39
- Review of Policy Research, 2004, v. 21, n. 3, p. 405, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00084.x
- Article
40
- Journal of American History, 2024, v. 111, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1093/jahist/jaae003
- Article
43
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2004, v. 9, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
45
- Houston Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 771
- Article
46
- Chicano/Latino Law Review, 2010, v. 29, p. 69
- Article
47
- UCLA Law Review, 2019, v. 66, n. 2, p. 522
- Article
48
- Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2003, v. 2003, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
49
- Multicultural Perspectives, 2005, v. 7, n. 2, p. 12, doi. 10.1207/s15327892mcp0702_3
- Article
50
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2015, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1229
- Article