Works matching DE "REFUSAL to deal (Law)"
Results: 10
THE PROTECTED PROFITS BENCHMARK: RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2014, v. 79, n. 1, p. 381
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
BEYOND REFUSAL TO DEAL: A CROSS-ATLANTIC VIEW OF COPYRIGHT, COMPETITION, AND INNOVATION POLICIES.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2014, v. 79, n. 1, p. 139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Facts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence.
- Published in:
- Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 2014, v. 15, n. 2, p. 84
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
MONOPOLIZING DIGITAL COMMERCE.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2023, v. 64, n. 6, p. 1677
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Accounting for colonial complicities through Refusals in researching agency across borders.
- Published in:
- Journal of Social Issues, 2022, v. 78, n. 2, p. 413, doi. 10.1111/josi.12473
- Publication type:
- Article
Platform Exclusion of Competing Sellers.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2024, v. 49, n. 2, p. 299
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
North Korean Defectors' Self-representation as the Politics of Refusal.
- Published in:
- Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies, 2021, v. 35, n. 3, p. 69, doi. 10.1080/02560046.2021.1985550
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Refusal to Deal, Intellectual Property Rights, and Antitrust.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 533, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewt004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Liability for Data Scraping Prohibitions under the Refusal to Deal Doctrine: An Incremental Step toward More Robust Sherman Act Enforcement.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 7, p. 1901
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A. Obiectul acțiunii în contencios administrativ. Refuz nejustificat de soluționare a cererii.
- Published in:
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2012, n. 3, p. 138
- Publication type:
- Article