A relational approach to moral decision-making: The majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1995, v. 81, n. 2, p. 167, doi. 10.1080/00335639509384107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "PLANNED Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey"
Results: 113
1
2
HOW RACE-SELECTIVE AND SEX-SELECTIVE BANS ON ABORTION EXPOSE THE COLOR-CODED DIMENSIONS OF THE RIGHT TO ABORTION AND DEFICIENCIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR WOMEN OF COLOR.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 3, p. 545
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Dignitary Harms and Abortion Law.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2022, v. 22, n. 8, p. 85, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Taking Abortion Rights Seriously: Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 2, p. 325, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12256
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Advance Directives Containing Pregnancy Exclusions: Are They Constitutional?
- Published in:
- North East Journal of Legal Studies, 2015, v. 34, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Mandatory Ultrasounds and the Precession of Simulacra.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2017, v. 54, n. 1, p. 117
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
MINNESOTA AFTER DOBBS: Understanding the state Constitution’s protections for reproductive rights.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2022, v. 79, n. 9, p. 18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
MINNESOTA SHOULD STRENGTHEN ITS PROTECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2022, v. 79, n. 9, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES? WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH, GONZALES, AND JUSTICE KENNEDY’S VISION OF AMERICAN ABORTION JURISPRUDENCE.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 3, p. 719
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
PROTECTING PRENATAL PERSONS: DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROHIBIT ABORTION?
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 539
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS: DOES MARBURY'S HOLDING APPLY IN A POST-WARREN COURT WORLD?
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2005, v. 28, n. 3, p. 713
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Making Sense of Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt: The Development of a New Approach to the Undue Burden Standard.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2017, v. 65, n. 4, p. 757
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
THE BURDEN IS UNDUE: WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH AND THE EVOLUTION, CLARIFICATION, AND APPLICATION OF THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2017, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
ALITO VERSUS ROE V. WADE: DOBBS AS A MEANS OF CIRCUMVENTION, AVOIDANCE, ATTENUATION AND BETRAYAL OF THE CONSTITUTION.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2023, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
EXPLORING THE BOUNDARIES OF OBERGEFELL.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 6, p. 2063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
STRANGE FRUIT: WHAT HAPPENED TO THE UNITED STATES DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT?
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 3, p. 443
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
RELIANCE BY WHOM? THE FALSE PROMISE OF SOCIETAL RELIANCE IN STARE DECISIS ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 6, p. 2094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The Legal Status of Abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is Overruled.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 2012, v. 27, n. 3, p. 181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
DOES STARE DECISIS PRECLUDE RECONSIDERATION OF ROE V. WADE? A CRITIQUE OF PLANNED OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. CASEY.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 2, p. 283
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
DOES STARE DECISIS PRECLUDE RECONSIDERATION OF ROE V. WADE? A CRITIQUE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. CASEY.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 2, p. 283
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, FEDERALISM, AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 1119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
ABORTION TRAVEL AND THE LIMITS OF CHOICE.
- Published in:
- FIU Law Review, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 27
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Whole Woman's Health and the Supreme Court's Kaleidoscopic Review of Constitutional Rights.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2015, p. 153
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
PROTECTING RELIGIOUS PLURALISM: HOW THE LIBERTY THAT SUPPORTS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE PROTECTS RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS.
- Published in:
- Regent University Law Review, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 461
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
THE TRUE JURISPRUDENCE OF DOUBT: THE THRESHOLD QUESTIONS OF PERSONHOOD THAT THE SUPREME COURT WOULDN'T, COULDN'T, AND SHOULDN'T ANSWER.
- Published in:
- Regent University Law Review, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
CASEY'S UNDUE BURDEN AND WHOLE WOMEN'S HEALTH'S INTEREST-BALANCING TESTS ARE PRO-LIFE OPPORTUNITIES.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 4, p. 645
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
RESTORING CASEY'S UNDUE-BURDEN STANDARD AFTER WHOLE WOMEN'S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 4, p. 701
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
FIVE PROVOCATIVE PRO-LIFE PROPOSALS.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 4, p. 661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
A PUTATIVE RIGHT IN SEARCH OF A CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTIFICATION: UNDERSTANDING PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. CASEY'S EQUALITY RATIONALE AND HOW IT UNDERMINES WOMEN'S EQUALITY.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 4, p. 593
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
LIBERTY FINDS NO REFUGE: THE DOUBTFILLED FUTURE OF CASEY'S UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
THE INSULAR CITIZENS: AMERICA'S LOST ELECTORATE V. STARE DECISIS.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 797
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
THE FIVE DAYS IN JUNE WHEN VALUES DIED IN AMERICAN LAW.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 1, p. 115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
GIVE ME BACK MY BIG GULP! THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF OBESITY REGULATIONS UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 4, p. 847
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Say It Ain't Roe: Dobbs and Reason Bans Are Trojan Horses for the Down Syndrome Community.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 2, p. 817
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Disclosure Two Ways.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Respecting Intent and Dispelling Stereotypes by Reducing Unintended Pregnancy.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, n. 2, p. 341, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12250
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12194
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Casey Meets the Crisis Pregnancy Centers.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12196
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
PRENATAL PERSONHOOD AND LIFE'S INTRINSIC VALUE: REAPPRAISING DWORKIN ON ABORTION.
- Published in:
- Legal Theory, 2016, v. 22, n. 2, p. 124, doi. 10.1017/S1352325216000094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Planned Parenthood v Casey.
- Published in:
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 1993, v. 269, n. 17, p. 2249, doi. 10.1001/jama.1993.03500170079038
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
RETHINKING THE "FORCE" BEHIND "FORCED PROCREATION": THE CASE FOR GIVING WOMEN EXCLUSIVE DECISIONAL AUTHORITY OVER THEIR CRYOPRESERVED PRE-EMBRYOS.
- Published in:
- DePaul Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 2, p. 737
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
CASEY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: REVISITING AN OLD CASE TO RESOLVE A NEW COMPELLED SPEECH CONTROVERSY.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 4, p. 951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Physician Speech and State Control: Furthering Partisan Interests at the Expense of Good Health.
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
UNDUE SCHIZOPHRENIA: SPLIT DECISIONS, CONFUSED SCHOLARS, AND REVERSING UNWORKABLE ABORTION PRECEDENT.
- Published in:
- Willamette Law Review, 2018, v. 54, n. 2, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Informed Consent as Compelled Professional Speech: Fictions, Facts, and Open Questions.
- Published in:
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 50, p. 11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
The Smokescreen Problem in Abortion Jurisprudence: How the Undue Burden Standard and Long-Term Legislative Tactics Allow Courts to Turn a Blind Eye to True Legislative Intent.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Speech as Speech: "Professional Speech" and Missouri's Informed Consent for Abortion Statute.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 481
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Privacy: Pre- and Post-Dobbs.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2023, v. 61, n. 1, p. 62
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
The Violence Against Women Act and its Impact on the U.S. Supreme Court and International Law: A Story of Vindication, Loss, and a New Human Rights Paradigm.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
ABORTION, PERSUASION, AND EMOTION: IMPLICATIONS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON EMOTION FOR READING CASEY.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2008, v. 83, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article