Works matching DE "PHYSICIAN malpractice cases"
1
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2010, v. 26, n. 3, p. 569, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewp022
- Durrance, Christine Piette
- Article
2
- 2008
- Kesselheim, Aaron S.;
- Studdert, David M.
- Letter
3
- 2008
- Hartz, Arthur J.;
- Green, Michael
- Letter
4
- 2007
- Kesselheim, Aaron S.;
- Studdert, David M.
- Editorial
5
- Review of Litigation, 2012, v. 31, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
6
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 955
- Article
7
- Indian Journal of Urology, 2009, v. 25, n. 3, p. 356, doi. 10.4103/0970-1591.56204
- Article
8
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2009, v. 37, n. 4, p. 792, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00450.x
- Article
10
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 5, p. 33
- Watkins, W. David;
- Lavery, Richard
- Article
11
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 10, p. 20
- Article
12
- Clinician Reviews, 2013, v. 23, n. 5, p. 21
- Pallentino, Julia;
- Lang, David M.
- Article
15
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 12, p. 55
- Lang, David M.;
- Pallentino, Julia
- Article
16
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 12, p. 51
- Pallentino, Julia;
- Lang, David M.
- Article
17
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 2, p. 24
- Article
18
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 2, p. 26
- Article
19
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 10
- Article
20
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
21
- Clinician Reviews, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
22
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 8, p. 4
- Article
23
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 8, p. 4
- Article
24
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 8, p. 4
- Article
25
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 4, p. 11
- Article
26
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 4, p. 11
- Article
27
- Clinician Reviews, 2009, v. 19, n. 4, p. 11
- Article
28
- Clinician Reviews, 2007, v. 17, n. 10, p. 48
- Article
29
- Clinician Reviews, 2007, v. 17, n. 9, p. 40
- Article
30
- Clinician Reviews, 2007, v. 17, n. 8, p. 48
- Article
31
- Clinician Reviews, 2007, v. 17, n. 8, p. 44
- Article
32
- Clinician Reviews, 2006, v. 16, n. 10, p. 29
- Article
33
- Clinician Reviews, 2006, v. 16, n. 10, p. 28
- Article
34
- Clinician Reviews, 2006, v. 16, n. 10, p. 28
- Article
35
- Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 2012, v. 55, n. 1, p. 92, doi. 10.1353/pbm.2012.0000
- Article
36
- Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, 2007, n. 16, p. 171
- Article
37
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 4, p. 1224
- Article
38
- Nature, 2011, v. 477, n. 7365, p. 384, doi. 10.1038/477384a
- Article
39
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
40
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 111
- Ulfbeck, Vibe;
- Hartlev, Mette;
- Schultz, Mårten
- Article
41
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
42
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
43
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
45
- Clinical Risk, 2010, v. 16, n. 4, p. 143, doi. 10.1258/cr.2010.010041
- Article
46
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2009, v. 54, n. 8, p. 18
- Article
47
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 38
- Article
48
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2007, v. 52, n. 7, p. 29
- Article
49
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2007, v. 52, n. 7, p. 28
- Article
50
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2007, v. 52, n. 1, p. 41
- Article