Works matching DE "PHILOSOPHY of rhetoric"
1
- CLCWeb: Comparative Literature & Culture: A Web Journal, 2010, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1, doi. 10.7771/1481-4374.1671
- Article
3
- Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 2021, v. 20, n. 3, p. 459, doi. 10.1007/s11712-021-09790-z
- Article
4
- Communication Research Trends, 2020, v. 39, n. 2, p. 5
- Article
5
- College English, 2018, v. 80, n. 6, p. 517, doi. 10.58680/ce201829740
- Article
8
- Environmental Communication, 2007, v. 1, n. 2, p. 218, doi. 10.1080/17524030701642785
- Article
13
- Nova Tellus, 2015, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
16
- Nova Tellus, 2010, v. 28, n. 2, p. 181
- Article
17
- South Atlantic Review, 2006, v. 71, n. 4, p. 26
- Article
18
- Universitas Philosophica, 2023, v. 40, n. 81, p. 145, doi. 10.11144/Javeriana.uph40-81.rcej
- RESTREPO RAMÍREZ, ALEXANDER
- Article
19
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1989, v. 109, p. 1, doi. 10.2307/632028
- Article
20
- Communication Monographs, 1995, v. 62, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.1080/03637759509376345
- Foss, Sonja K.;
- Griffin, Cindy L.
- Article
21
- Paragraph, 2021, v. 44, n. 2, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.3366/para.2021.0361
- Article
22
- Cognitio - Revista de Filosofia, 2019, v. 20, n. 2, p. 404, doi. 10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p404-428
- Article
24
- Western Speech, 1969, v. 33, n. 1, p. 48, doi. 10.1080/10570316909384559
- Article
25
- Western Speech, 1968, v. 32, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1080/10570316809389562
- Article
26
- Western Speech, 1968, v. 32, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1080/10570316809389561
- Article
27
- Western Speech, 1968, v. 32, n. 2, p. 118, doi. 10.1080/10570316809389560
- Article
28
- Western Speech, 1968, v. 32, n. 2, p. 104, doi. 10.1080/10570316809389558
- Article
29
- Review of Communication, 2017, v. 17, n. 4, p. 357, doi. 10.1080/15358593.2017.1367827
- Article
30
- Prose Studies, 2007, v. 29, n. 3, p. 359, doi. 10.1080/01440350701679198
- Article
32
- Rhetoric Review, 1990, v. 9, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.1080/07350199009388911
- Article
33
- Rhetoric Review, 1987, v. 6, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1080/07350198709359152
- Article
34
- Philosophical Investigations, 2004, v. 27, n. 3, p. 222, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2004.00225.x
- Article
35
- Rhetorik, 2011, v. 30, p. 17, doi. 10.1515/9783110236385.17
- Article
36
- Rhetorik, 2011, v. 30, p. 30, doi. 10.1515/9783110236385.30
- Article
37
- Rhetorik, 2011, v. 30, p. 69, doi. 10.1515/9783110236385.69
- Article
38
- Rhetorik, 2011, v. 30, p. 80, doi. 10.1515/9783110236385.80
- Article
39
- Rhetorik, 2011, v. 30, p. 96, doi. 10.1515/9783110236385.96
- Article
40
- Social & Legal Studies, 2008, v. 17, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1177/0964663907086460
- Article
41
- Educational Researcher, 2009, v. 38, n. 6, p. 463, doi. 10.3102/0013189X09344615
- Article
42
- Argumentation, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1007/s10503-012-9280-9
- Rapp, Christof;
- Wagner, Tim
- Article
43
- Argumentation, 2007, v. 21, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1007/s10503-007-9042-2
- Article
44
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
45
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014818.10143.32
- Article
46
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014868.08915.2a
- Article
47
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014869.24575.5b
- Article
48
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014870.56718.6c
- Article
49
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014871.72377.a6
- Article
50
- Argumentation, 2004, v. 18, n. 1, p. 127, doi. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014872.98819.85
- Article