Works matching DE "PHILOSOPHY of punishment"
1
- BC Studies, 2009, n. 162, p. 25
- FERGUSON, GERRY;
- BERGER, BENJAMIN L.
- Article
2
- Alabama Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
3
- Philosophia, 2013, v. 41, n. 4, p. 945, doi. 10.1007/s11406-013-9468-8
- Article
4
- Nova Tellus, 2018, v. 36, n. 2, p. 9, doi. 10.19130/iifl.nt.2018.36.2.794
- Article
6
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2019, v. 22, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1007/s10677-018-9966-7
- Article
7
- Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 2017, v. 9, n. 2, p. 99
- Article
9
- Philosophical Forum, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1111/phil.12066
- Article
10
- Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 2016, v. 98, n. 3, p. 302, doi. 10.1515/agph-2016-0014
- Article
11
- Metaphilosophy, 2012, v. 43, n. 1/2, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01726.x
- Article
13
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 429, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095319
- Article
14
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 401, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095318
- Article
15
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 375, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095317
- Article
16
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 355, doi. 10.1177/1462474508095316
- AJZENSTADT, MIMI;
- BARAK, ARIEL
- Article
17
- Punishment & Society, 2008, v. 10, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1177/1462474507087196
- Article
18
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1017
- Article
19
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, v. 37, n. 1, p. 217, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqw003
- Article
20
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2010, v. 30, n. 4, p. 775, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqq027
- Article
21
- Stance (1943-1880), 2015, v. 8, p. 65
- Article
22
- Stance (1943-1880), 2014, v. 7, p. 69
- Article
26
- Journal of Value Inquiry, 2014, v. 48, n. 4, p. 643, doi. 10.1007/s10790-014-9463-8
- Article
27
- Philosophical Studies, 2015, v. 172, n. 10, p. 2625, doi. 10.1007/s11098-015-0477-2
- Article
28
- Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies, 2010, v. 58, p. 31
- Article
30
- Think: Philosophy for Everyone, 2018, v. 17, n. 48, p. 51, doi. 10.1017/S147717561700032X
- Article
31
- Analysis, 2017, v. 77, n. 3, p. 619, doi. 10.1093/analys/anw022
- Article
32
- Impulso, 2003, v. 14, n. 35, p. 11
- Article
33
- Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2012, v. 93, n. 2, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01424.x
- Article
34
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2018, v. 37, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2018.1449364
- Article
35
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2018, v. 37, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2018.1441227
- Article
37
- International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2014, v. 18, n. 11, p. 1091, doi. 10.1080/13603116.2013.875068
- Chitiyo, Morgan;
- Chitiyo, George;
- Chitiyo, Jonathan;
- Oyedele, Victoria;
- Makoni, Richard;
- Fonnah, Davidson;
- Chipangure, Luke
- Article
38
- Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 2014, v. 9, n. 8, p. 1143, doi. 10.1093/scan/nst092
- Krueger, Frank;
- Hoffman, Morris;
- Walter, Henrik;
- Grafman, Jordan
- Article
40
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2019, v. 13, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.1007/s11572-018-9460-2
- Dancig-Rosenberg, Hadar;
- Dagan, Netanel
- Article
42
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9215-z
- Article
43
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9292-z
- Article
44
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2012, v. 6, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1007/s11572-011-9131-z
- Article
45
- Arizona Quarterly, 2016, v. 72, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1353/arq.2016.0007
- Article
46
- Philosophy of Science, 2016, v. 83, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.1086/684166
- Article
47
- Law & Philosophy, 2013, v. 32, n. 4, p. 459, doi. 10.1007/s10982-012-9147-0
- Article
48
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 141
- Article
49
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
50
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 131
- Article