Works matching DE "PHILOSOPHY %26 science"
2
- Teachers College Record, 1983, v. 85, n. 2, p. 251, doi. 10.1177/016146818308500203
- Article
4
- Social Science Journal, 1999, v. 36, n. 4, p. 561, doi. 10.1016/S0362-3319(99)00037-3
- Article
5
- Sociological Inquiry, 1969, v. 39, n. 2, p. 219, doi. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1969.tb00966.x
- Article
7
- Social Alternatives, 1978, v. 1, n. 3, p. 61
- Article
9
- Notes & Queries, 1984, v. 31, n. 1, p. 9, doi. 10.1093/nq/31-1-9
- Article
10
- Modern Age, 2011, v. 53, n. 4, p. 6
- Article
11
- Przeglad Tomistyczny, 2018, v. 24, p. 373
- Article
12
- Sociologia, 2007, v. 39, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
13
- Journal of Education, 1886, v. 23, n. 10, p. 148
- Article
14
- Journal of Education, 1883, v. 17, n. 25, p. 388
- Article
15
- Culture & Organization, 2006, v. 12, n. 4, p. 331, doi. 10.1080/14759550601033572
- Article
16
- Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 2007, v. 9, n. 1/2, p. 131
- Article
17
- Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 2014, v. 80, n. 4, p. 368, doi. 10.1111/theo.12058
- Article
18
- Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 2012, v. 78, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2011.01118.x
- Article
22
- Mathematics Enthusiast, 2012, v. 9, n. 1/2, p. 207, doi. 10.54870/1551-3440.1241
- Article
23
- Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy, 2007, v. 45, n. 1, p. 17, doi. 10.1007/s11024-006-9017-8
- Feller, Irwin;
- Gamota, George
- Article
25
- Narrative, 2007, v. 15, n. 3, p. 306, doi. 10.1353/nar.2007.0023
- Article
26
- Nous (0029-4624), 2000, v. 34, n. 4, p. 622, doi. 10.1111/0029-4624.00281
- Article
28
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 407, doi. 10.1177/0048393113486523
- Article
29
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2012, v. 42, n. 4, p. 543, doi. 10.1177/0048393110381209
- Article
30
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2010, v. 40, n. 4, p. 579, doi. 10.1177/0048393109340664
- Article
31
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2007, v. 37, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1177/0048393107303759
- Article
32
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2005, v. 35, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1177/0048393105277986
- Article
33
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2005, v. 35, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0048393104271921
- Article
34
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2004, v. 34, n. 2, p. 182, doi. 10.1177/0048393103262550
- Article
35
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2001, v. 31, n. 2, p. 252, doi. 10.1177/004839310103100207
- Article
36
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1991, v. 21, n. 2, p. 149, doi. 10.1177/004839319102100201
- Article
37
- Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005, v. 29, n. 1, p. 99, doi. 10.1093/cje/bei013
- Article
38
- Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2000, v. 24, n. 3, p. 267, doi. 10.1093/cje/24.3.267
- Article
39
- Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 2012, v. 15, n. 1, p. 287
- Article
41
- Parallax, 2007, v. 13, n. 4, p. 78, doi. 10.1080/13534640701682834
- Article
42
- European Legacy, 2008, v. 13, n. 5, p. 589, doi. 10.1080/10848770802268766
- Article
43
- European Legacy, 2008, v. 13, n. 5, p. 605, doi. 10.1080/10848770802268790
- Article
45
- Journal Plus Education / Educaţia Plus, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
46
- Journal Plus Education / Educaţia Plus, 2010, v. 6, n. 2, p. 73
- Article
47
- Information (2078-2489), 2015, v. 6, n. 4, p. 693, doi. 10.3390/info6040693
- Article
48
- Abacus, 1969, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1969.tb00157.x
- Article