PERRY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE: ABANDONING THE SUPREME COURT'S FUNDAMENTAL CONCERN WITH EYEWITNESS RELIABILITY.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 2, p. 571
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "PERRY v. New Hampshire (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 5
1
2
THE DANGERS OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION: A CALL FOR GREATER STATE INVOLVEMENT TO ENSURE FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS.
- Published in:
- Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
A MODEL FOR FIXING IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE AFTER PERRY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 8, p. 1535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
THE DANGERS OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION: A CALL FOR GREATER STATE INVOLVEMENT TO ENSURE FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 3, p. 1415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS HAVE A DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO AN EXPERT ON EYEWITNESS RELIABILITY: WHY THE COURT WAS WRONG IN PERRY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE (2012).
- Published in:
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article