PERA & UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES: THE TENSION OF THE KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT AS ILLUSTRATED BY LANCASTER COUNTY V. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2017, v. 26, n. 2, p. 277By:DuGan, Zachary M.Publication type:Article
LESSONS FROM MOORE V. STEPHENR. REED AND ITS PROGENY WHO HAS THE POWER TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS UNDER PLAN A OF THE OPTIONAL THIRD CLASS CITY CHARTER LAW: CITY COUNCIL OR THE MAYOR?Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2017, v. 26, n. 2, p. 183By:Walmer, Douglas L.Publication type:Article
ENHANCING PENNSYLVANIA'S LABOR LAW IN REGARD TO THE PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS ACT WITH ACT 111-A LOOK AT CITY OF ERIE V. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELA TIONS BOARD.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 2, p. 361By:Crist, Nina M.Publication type:Article
WHERE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES COLLIDE: AN ANALYSIS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY COURT APPOINTED EMPLOYEES ASS'N V. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 539By:Durr, Megan C.Publication type:Article
HOW ANTISMOKING POLICIES AFFECT A PUBLIC EMPLOYER'S COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OBLIGATION: AN ANALYSIS OF BOROUGH OF ELLWOOD CITY V. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 481By:Applegate, KylePublication type:Article
THE BENEFITS OF HINDSIGHT: WHY THE PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER A UNION REPRESENTATIVE IS REASONABLY AVAILABLE AND WHETHER EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST WHEN AN EMPLOYEE SELECTS A WEINGARTEN REPRESENTATIVE.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2009, v. 18, n. 2, p. 685By:Santucci, AdamPublication type:Article