Works matching DE "PATENTABILITY -- Lawsuits %26 claims"
1
- 2013
- Blankfein-Tabachnick, David H.
- Essay
2
- American University Law Review, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
3
- American University Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1089
- Article
4
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 62, n. 4, p. 827
- SMYTH, ROBERT J.;
- BERNSTEIN, DAVID P.;
- BROOKE, ADAM D.;
- FINK IV, RUDOLPH;
- KIM, NICHOLAS J.;
- LEE, JANICE H.
- Article
5
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 2014, v. 21, n. 1, p. 141
- Article
6
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2019, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
7
- Banking Law Journal, 2012, v. 129, n. 9, p. 847
- FISCHER, ROBERT H.;
- SHARROTT, DOUGLAS;
- CALABRO, JOSH
- Article
8
- Elon Law Review, 2015, v. 7, n. 1, p. 431
- GENHEIMER, CHRISTOPHER W.
- Article
9
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 2, p. 629
- Article
10
- George Mason Law Review, 2016, v. 23, n. 4, p. 901
- Article
11
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2020, v. 70, n. 3, p. 791
- Article
12
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1165
- Article
13
- Mercer Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1049
- Article
14
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1081
- Article
15
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, p. 526, doi. 10.15779/Z38W950N99
- Article
16
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2013, v. 28, n. 2, p. 1217
- Article
17
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 645
- Article
18
- Minnesota Law Review, 2020, v. 105, n. 2, p. 527
- Kesan, Jay P.;
- Wangt, Runhua
- Article
19
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1975
- Article
20
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2015, v. 18, n. 1, p. 141
- Article
21
- Michigan Technology Law Review, 2020, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
22
- Indiana Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 771
- CARTER, R. TREVOR;
- HAYDEN, LESLIE B.;
- DODGE, REID E.
- Article
23
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 256
- Article
24
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 11, p. 879, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa146
- Deshpande, Rohan;
- Kamath, Karan
- Article
25
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 3, p. 210, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpy175
- Article
26
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt226
- Article
27
- SMU Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 1, p. 299
- Article
28
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 117
- Heinrich, Alan J.;
- Abernethy, Christopher T.
- Article
29
- DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
30
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
31
- Willamette Law Review, 2019, v. 55, n. 3, p. 587
- Article
32
- Willamette Law Review, 2018, v. 54, n. 3, p. 587
- Article
33
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2014, v. 13, n. 3, p. 535
- Article
34
- Touro Law Review, 2011, v. 27, n. 2, p. 379
- Article
36
- Sydney Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 3, p. 557
- Article
37
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 7, p. 2149
- Article
38
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
39
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 628
- Article
40
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 6, p. 1858
- Article
45
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2013, v. 57, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
46
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1111
- Article
47
- Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2013, v. 2013, n. 2, p. 423
- Article
48
- Business Lawyer, 2014, v. 70, n. 1, p. 271
- Article
49
- Business Lawyer, 2013, v. 69, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
50
- Business Lawyer, 2012, v. 68, n. 1, p. 281
- Article