Works matching DE "PATENT policy"
1
- Science & Public Policy (SPP), 2019, v. 46, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1093/scipol/scy040
- Long, Cheryl Xiaoning;
- Wang, Jun
- Article
2
- Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 2015, n. 17, p. 68
- Abu Noman, Abul Bashar Mohammad;
- Khan Chowdhury, Ekram Uddin
- Article
3
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2017, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1
- CONTRERAS, JORGE L.;
- LAKSHANÉ, ROHINI;
- LEWIS, PAXTON M.
- Article
4
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2017, v. 7, n. 1, p. v
- Article
5
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1527, doi. 10.15779/Z38F76670Q
- Galetovic, Alexander;
- Haher, Stephen;
- Zaretzki, Lew
- Article
6
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1489, doi. 10.15779/Z38RR1PM7N
- Article
7
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1457, doi. 10.15779/Z38RN30751
- Contreras, Jorge L.;
- Gaessler, Fabian;
- Helmers, Christian;
- Love, Brian J.
- Article
8
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1433, doi. 10.15779/Z38154DP3H
- Kappas, David;
- Michel, Paul R.
- Article
9
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1381, doi. 10.15779/Z38WD3Q19B
- Epstein, Richard A.;
- Noroozi, Kayvan B.
- Article
10
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1313, doi. 10.15779/Z388P5V91H
- Article
11
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, n. 1, p. 259, doi. 10.15779/Z38J85N
- Article
12
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
13
- Regional Studies, 2009, v. 43, n. 4, p. 513, doi. 10.1080/00343400701874131
- Gonçalves, Eduardo;
- Almeida, Eduardo
- Article
14
- Nature, 2008, v. 456, n. 7223, p. 685, doi. 10.1038/456685a
- Article
15
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2018, v. 21, n. 1/2, p. 52, doi. 10.1111/jwip.12090
- Sharma, Ruchi;
- Paswan, Audhesh K.;
- Ambrammal, Sunil K.;
- Dhanora, Madan
- Article
16
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2017, v. 20, n. 5/6, p. 160, doi. 10.1111/jwip.12087
- Tvedt, Morten Walløe;
- Forsberg, Ellen‐Marie
- Article
17
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2018, v. 26, n. 2, p. 187
- Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore
- Article
18
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2018, v. 26, n. 2, p. 133
- Article
19
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2018, v. 25, n. 2, p. 159
- Article
20
- CATO Journal, 2001, v. 20, n. 3, p. 401
- Article
21
- American Economic Review, 2016, v. 106, n. 5, p. 183, doi. 10.1257/aer.p20161091
- Budish, Eric;
- Roin, Benjamin N.;
- Williams, Heidi
- Article
22
- Review of Industrial Organization, 2016, v. 48, n. 3, p. 289, doi. 10.1007/s11151-015-9484-x
- Norman, George;
- Pepall, Lynne;
- Richards, Dan
- Article
23
- Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 2016, v. 28, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.1080/1941126X.2016.1130459
- Article
25
- Third World Quarterly, 2009, v. 30, n. 6, p. 1197, doi. 10.1080/01436590903037499
- Article
26
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 3, p. 551
- Article
27
- Nebraska Journal of Economics & Business, 1972, v. 11, n. 2, p. 59
- Article
28
- Nebraska Journal of Economics & Business, 1971, v. 10, n. 1, p. 41
- Article
29
- Nebraska Journal of Economics & Business, 1970, v. 9, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
30
- American Economic Review, 1948, v. 38, n. 2, p. 235
- Article
31
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1565
- Article
32
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2010, v. 16, n. 4, p. 358, doi. 10.1057/jcb.2010.17
- Meyers, Thomas C.;
- Schoen, Adam M.
- Article
34
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 38, n. 3, p. 913
- Article
35
- Journal of Generic Medicines, 2009, v. 6, n. 4, p. 379, doi. 10.1057/jgm.2009.28
- Article
36
- Journal of Generic Medicines, 2006, v. 4, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4950050
- Article
37
- Scientometrics, 2018, v. 117, n. 2, p. 687, doi. 10.1007/s11192-018-2893-5
- Article
38
- Scientometrics, 2017, v. 111, n. 2, p. 793, doi. 10.1007/s11192-017-2311-4
- Dechezleprêtre, Antoine;
- Ménière, Yann;
- Mohnen, Myra
- Article
39
- Scientometrics, 2017, v. 111, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1007/s11192-017-2258-5
- Huang, Hung-Chun;
- Shih, Hsin-Yu;
- Ke, Tsung-Han
- Article
40
- Scientometrics, 2009, v. 78, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1007/s11192-007-1988-1
- Article
41
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2009, v. 33, n. 2, p. 415
- Article
42
- Journal of Developing Areas, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 165, doi. 10.1353/jda.2015.0170
- Sharma, Ruchi;
- Ambrammal, Sunil Kumar
- Article
43
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021, v. 16, n. 10, p. 1078, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpab096
- Article
44
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2018, v. 13, n. 3, p. 186, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx184
- Article
45
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 5, p. 408, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx037
- Article
46
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 629
- Article
47
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2010, v. 24, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
48
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2014, v. 13, n. 4, p. 250, doi. 10.1038/nrd4303
- Article
49
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 69, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
50
- BioEssays, 2009, v. 31, n. 11, p. A7
- Article