Works matching DE "PATENT disclosure"
1
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2012, v. 57, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1205700103
- Article
3
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 2, p. 76, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw193
- Smyth, Darren;
- Sae-Heng, Myra
- Article
4
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 10, p. 762, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw123
- Ferrill, Elizabeth;
- Roorda, Jeanette
- Article
5
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 10, p. 776, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt151
- Article
6
- European Review of Economic History, 2020, v. 24, n. 3, p. 447, doi. 10.1093/ereh/hez012
- Article
7
- Houston Law Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 2, p. 377
- Article
8
- Houston Law Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 2, p. 265
- Article
9
- New York University Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1293
- Article
10
- Accounting Review, 2021, v. 96, n. 5, p. 291, doi. 10.2308/TAR-2019-1050
- Glaeser, Stephen A.;
- Landsman, Wayne R.
- Article
11
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1849
- Article
12
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1825
- Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore
- Article
13
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1785
- Article
14
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1715
- Article
15
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1679
- Article
16
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1631
- Du Mont, Jason;
- Janis, Mark D.
- Article
17
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1603
- Article
18
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1573
- Article
19
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1543
- Article
20
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1459
- Article
21
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1455
- Article
22
- Penn State Law Review, 2020, v. 125, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
23
- Einstein (16794508), 2013, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1590/S1679-45082013000100003
- Gustavo Dias, Cleber;
- de Almeida, Roberto Barbosa
- Article
24
- Chemical Engineering, 2014, v. 121, n. 9, p. 45
- Article
25
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 65
- Article
26
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. v
- Article
27
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2017, v. 111, n. 2, p. 377
- Simon, Brenda M.;
- Sichelman, Ted
- Article
28
- Florida State University Law Review, 2012, v. 40, n. 1, p. 57
- Article
29
- R&D Management, 2015, v. 45, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1111/radm.12085
- Gerken, Jan M.;
- Moehrle, Martin G.;
- Walter, Lothar
- Article
30
- Science & Public Policy (SPP), 2016, v. 43, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1093/scipol/scv011
- Xuhua Chang;
- Qiang Chen;
- Fong, Patrick S. W.
- Article
31
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2022, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1563
- Article
32
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2020, v. 51, n. 4, p. 673, doi. 10.26686/vuwlr.v51i4.6702
- Article
33
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2017, v. 78, n. 6, p. 1379
- Article
34
- Duke Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 4, p. 845
- Article
35
- Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2016, v. 12, n. 3, p. 507, doi. 10.1093/joclec/nhw017
- Article
36
- Columbia Science & Technology Law Review, 2023, v. 24, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.52214/stlr.v24i2.11628
- Article