Works matching DE "PATENT claim interpretation"

Results: 52

A Little Common Sense is a Dangerous Thing: The Inherent Inconsistency Between KSR and Current Official Notice Policy.

Published in:

University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2012, v. 10, n. 1, p. 163

By:

Sheets, Eli M.

Publication type:

Article

DISTINCTLY CLAIMING AN INVENTION.

Published in:

SMU Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 541

By:

Sandrik, Karen E.

Publication type:

Article

CAPRICIOUS PATENT BOUNDARIES: THE "RELIBERALIZATION" OF POST-ISSUANCE PATENT CLAIM AMENDMENTS.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2020, v. 35, n. 4, p. 961, doi. 10.15779/Z38W08WH48

By:

Crockett, Julien

Publication type:

Article

SURVEY OF ADDITIONAL IP AND TECHNOLOGY LAW DEVELOPMENTS.

Published in:: Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 1169
Publication type:: Article

TEVA V. SANDOZ: THE SUPREME COURT REJECTS MILLENNIAL FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S "CLEARLY ERRONEOUS" REVIEW STANDARD.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 399, doi. 10.15779/Z384R9G

By:

Havens, Cassandra E.

Publication type:

Article

OPERATING EFFICIENTLY POST-BILSKI BY ORDERING PATENT DOCTRINE DECISION-MAKING.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1673

By:

Crouch, Dennis;
Merges, Robert P.

Publication type:

Article

DE NUEVO SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN JURÍDICA DE LOS SECRETOS EMPRESARIALES (A PROPÓSITO DE LA LEY 1/2019, DE 20 DE FEBRERO, DE SECRETOS EMPRESARIALES).

Published in:

Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2019, n. 51, p. 46

By:

FUENTES, JOSÉ MASSAGUER

Publication type:

Article

ASPECTOS SUSTANTIVOS DE LA NUEVA LEY DE PATENTES.

Published in:

Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2016, n. 42, p. 20

By:

MASSAGUER FUENTES, JOSÉ

Publication type:

Article

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Evolving Impact on Claim Construction.

Published in:

Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 301

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

Different Infringement, Different Issue: Altering Issue Preclusion as Applied to Claim Construction.

Published in:

Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2011, v. 19, n. 3, p. 361

By:

Ferry, Matthew A.

Publication type:

Article

Patent Quality and Examination in Europe<sup>†</sup>.

Published in:

American Economic Review, 2016, v. 106, n. 5, p. 193, doi. 10.1257/aer.p20161093

By:

Harhoff, Dietmar

Publication type:

Article

PATENT LAW - PATENTABILITY POST-BILSKI: NO NEED TO THROW THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATH WATER WHEN DETERMINING SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Published in:

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2012, v. 34, n. 2, p. 421

By:

Davis, Jennifer L.

Publication type:

Article

Interfaces and Interoperability After Google v. Oracle.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2021, v. 100, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Lemley, Mark A.;
Samuelson, Pamela

Publication type:

Article

Revising Markman: A Procedural Reform to Patent Litigation.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2017, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1425

By:

Murphy, Gavin P. W.

Publication type:

Article

INFORMAL DEFERENCE: A HISTORICAL, EMPIRICAL, AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.

Published in:

Northwestern University Law Review, 2013, v. 108, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Anderson, J. Jonas;
Menell, Peter S.

Publication type:

Article

Of Fences and Definite Patent Boundaries.

Published in:

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2016, v. 18, n. 3, p. 563

By:

Varadarajan, Deepa

Publication type:

Article

"Judicial Hyperactivity" in the Federal Circuit: An Empirical Study.

Published in:

University of San Francisco Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 3, p. 721

By:

Field, Ted L.

Publication type:

Article

WHY CAN'T WE BE (F)RANDS?: THE EFFECT OF REASONABLE AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY COMMITMENTS ON STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENT LICENSING.

Published in:

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 317

By:

Keeler, Robert D.

Publication type:

Article

THE "BROADEST REASONABLE INTERPRETATION" AND APPLYING ISSUE PRECLUSION TO ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2018, v. 117, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.36644/mlr.117.2.broadest

By:

Tietz, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Article

FORCING PATENT CLAIMS.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 4, p. 513

By:

Tun-Jen Chiang

Publication type:

Article

Determinants of claim definiteness: myth of relative terms.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 10, p. 796, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz111

By:

Gavaraskar, Kirti N;
Kulkarni, Mohan

Publication type:

Article

Contracts, patents and chess--applying Arnold v Britton to patent claim construction.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw186

By:

Osgerby, Katharine;
Stothers, Christopher

Publication type:

Article

US Supreme Court rewrites standard for claim indefiniteness analysis.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 11, p. 874, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu152

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Jain, Reena;
Wang, Victor

Publication type:

Article

So when is a patent claim too broad?

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 8, p. 578, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt088

By:

Sharples, Andrew;
Kendall-Palmer, Carissa

Publication type:

Article

THE CENTRAL CLAIMING RENAISSANCE.

Published in:

Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 645

By:

Sawicki, Andres

Publication type:

Article

AMENDING PATENT CLAIMS.

Published in:

Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2018, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Reilly, Greg

Publication type:

Article

SCIENCE, PATENT LAW, AND EPISTEMIC LEGITIMACY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF TECHNICALLY TRAINED FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUDGES.

Published in:

Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 279

By:

Stiernberg, Charlie

Publication type:

Article

The credibility of expert witnesses in patent claim construction: the need to amend Rule 52 under Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz, Inc.

Published in:

Information & Communications Technology Law, 2016, v. 25, n. 3, p. 310, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2016.1244879

By:

Snowball, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

The Judiciary's Material Impact on Materials Patents: Patent Eligible Subject Matter in the Chemical & Materials Industries.

Published in:

Penn State Law Review, 2023, v. 127, n. 2, p. 567

By:

Erb, Chad

Publication type:

Article

IN YOUR OWN DEFENSE: THE IMPORTANCE OF IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM WITH PATENTING UNDER THE "LAWS OF NATURE".

Published in:

Pace Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 1, p. 196

By:

Schwartz, Laura

Publication type:

Article

RES OR RULES? PATENTS AND THE (UNCERTAIN) RULES OF THE GAME.

Published in:

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 481

By:

Morris, Emily Michiko

Publication type:

Article

Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents.

Published in:: GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2020, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1156, doi. 10.1093/grurint/ikaa135
Publication type:: Article

Vagueness of Patent Claim Language, Claim Construction and Patent Infringement – What a Mess!

Published in:: GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2020, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1097, doi. 10.1093/grurint/ikaa114
Publication type:: Article

INDEFINITENESS.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 479

By:

MAHANTA, SANJEEV K.

Publication type:

Article

IS IT TIME FOR A RULE 11 FOR THE PATENT BAR?

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2013, v. 53, n. 3, p. 351

By:

CLIFFORD, RALPH D.

Publication type:

Article

TECHNICAL FUNCTION DISCOVERY IN PATENT DATABASES FOR GENERATING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS.

Published in:

IADIS International Journal on Computer Science & Information Systems, 2016, v. 11, n. 2, p. 241

By:

Korobkin, Dmitriy M.;
Fomenkov, Sergey A.;
Kolesnikov, Sergey G.;
Golovanchikov, lexander B.

Publication type:

Article

A Distinction Without a Difference: Convergence in Claim Construction Standards.

Published in:

Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 1071

By:

Dolbow, Laura E.

Publication type:

Article

DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: OCTOBER 1, 2015 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016.

Published in:

Indiana Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1281, doi. 10.18060/4806.1170

By:

CARTER, R. TREVOR;
MORTON, TRENTON B.;
DODGE, REID E.

Publication type:

Article

THE COMPLETENESS REQUIREMENT IN PATENT LAW.

Published in:

Boston College Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 949

By:

KARSHTEDT, DMITRY

Publication type:

Article

Patent Claim Interpretation Review: Deference or Correction Driven?

Published in:

Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1095

By:

Cotropia, Christopher A.

Publication type:

Article

Patent Claim Obviousness in Jury Trials: Where's the Analysis?

Published in:

Journal of Business & Technology Law, 2011, v. 6, n. 2, p. 449

By:

DEMORY, WESLEY A.

Publication type:

Article

PATENT OPPOSITIONS IN AUSTRALIA: THE FACTS.

Published in:

University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 93

By:

WEATHERALL, KIMBERLEE;
ROTSTEIN, FIONA;
DENT, CHRIS;
CHRISTIE, ANDREW

Publication type:

Article

PATENT CLAIM APPORTIONMENT, PATENTEE INJURY, AND SEQUENTIAL INVENTION.

Published in:

George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 471

By:

Landers, Amy L.

Publication type:

Article

Increasing Certainty and Harnessing Private Information in the U.S. Patent System: A Proposal for Reform.

Published in:

Stanford Technology Law Review, 2010, n. 4, p. 1

By:

Meehan, Dr. Michael

Publication type:

Article

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

Published in:

Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 39

By:

ZEULI, TONY;
DUBIS, JOE

Publication type:

Article

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

Published in:

Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 9, p. 35

By:

ZEULI, TONY;
SINGH, AJAY

Publication type:

Article

Behavioral Claim Construction.

Published in:

Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 102, n. 3, p. 1273

By:

Bock, Jeremy W.

Publication type:

Article

MASTERING PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION: A PATENT SPECIAL MASTER'S PERSPECTIVE.

Published in:

Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 591

By:

Rando, Robert J.

Publication type:

Article

STRICT INTERPRETATION OF 35 U.S.C. § 112: REQUIRES UNIVERSITIES TO EXAMINE THEIR PATENTING METHODS.

Published in:

Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 1, p. 183

By:

Barkume, Sharon;
Bielski, Michael R.

Publication type:

Article

Stealing fire: a retrospective survey of biotech patent claims in the wake of Mayo v. Prometheus.

Published in:

Nature Biotechnology, 2012, v. 30, n. 8, p. 758, doi. 10.1038/nbt.2318

By:

Haanes, Elizabeth J;
Cànaves, Jaume M

Publication type:

Article