Works matching DE "PATENT claim interpretation"
Results: 52
DE NUEVO SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN JURÍDICA DE LOS SECRETOS EMPRESARIALES (A PROPÓSITO DE LA LEY 1/2019, DE 20 DE FEBRERO, DE SECRETOS EMPRESARIALES).
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2019, n. 51, p. 46
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
ASPECTOS SUSTANTIVOS DE LA NUEVA LEY DE PATENTES.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2016, n. 42, p. 20
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE "BROADEST REASONABLE INTERPRETATION" AND APPLYING ISSUE PRECLUSION TO ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2018, v. 117, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.36644/mlr.117.2.broadest
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORCING PATENT CLAIMS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 4, p. 513
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PATENT LAW - PATENTABILITY POST-BILSKI: NO NEED TO THROW THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATH WATER WHEN DETERMINING SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101.
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2012, v. 34, n. 2, p. 421
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CAPRICIOUS PATENT BOUNDARIES: THE "RELIBERALIZATION" OF POST-ISSUANCE PATENT CLAIM AMENDMENTS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2020, v. 35, n. 4, p. 961, doi. 10.15779/Z38W08WH48
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SURVEY OF ADDITIONAL IP AND TECHNOLOGY LAW DEVELOPMENTS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 1169
- Publication type:
- Article
TEVA V. SANDOZ: THE SUPREME COURT REJECTS MILLENNIAL FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S "CLEARLY ERRONEOUS" REVIEW STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 399, doi. 10.15779/Z384R9G
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
OPERATING EFFICIENTLY POST-BILSKI BY ORDERING PATENT DOCTRINE DECISION-MAKING.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1673
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The credibility of expert witnesses in patent claim construction: the need to amend Rule 52 under Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz, Inc.
- Published in:
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2016, v. 25, n. 3, p. 310, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2016.1244879
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PATENT CLAIM APPORTIONMENT, PATENTEE INJURY, AND SEQUENTIAL INVENTION.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 471
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Interfaces and Interoperability After Google v. Oracle.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2021, v. 100, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Revising Markman: A Procedural Reform to Patent Litigation.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2017, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1425
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Increasing Certainty and Harnessing Private Information in the U.S. Patent System: A Proposal for Reform.
- Published in:
- Stanford Technology Law Review, 2010, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 39
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 9, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
MASTERING PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION: A PATENT SPECIAL MASTER'S PERSPECTIVE.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
STRICT INTERPRETATION OF 35 U.S.C. § 112: REQUIRES UNIVERSITIES TO EXAMINE THEIR PATENTING METHODS.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 1, p. 183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE CENTRAL CLAIMING RENAISSANCE.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 645
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
AMENDING PATENT CLAIMS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2018, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SCIENCE, PATENT LAW, AND EPISTEMIC LEGITIMACY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF TECHNICALLY TRAINED FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUDGES.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patent Claim Interpretation Review: Deference or Correction Driven?
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patent Quality and Examination in Europe<sup>†</sup>.
- Published in:
- American Economic Review, 2016, v. 106, n. 5, p. 193, doi. 10.1257/aer.p20161093
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INFORMAL DEFERENCE: A HISTORICAL, EMPIRICAL, AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.
- Published in:
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2013, v. 108, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
DISTINCTLY CLAIMING AN INVENTION.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 541
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
WHY CAN'T WE BE (F)RANDS?: THE EFFECT OF REASONABLE AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY COMMITMENTS ON STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENT LICENSING.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 317
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Little Common Sense is a Dangerous Thing: The Inherent Inconsistency Between KSR and Current Official Notice Policy.
- Published in:
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2012, v. 10, n. 1, p. 163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
"Judicial Hyperactivity" in the Federal Circuit: An Empirical Study.
- Published in:
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 3, p. 721
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PATENT OPPOSITIONS IN AUSTRALIA: THE FACTS.
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 93
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Behavioral Claim Construction.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 102, n. 3, p. 1273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
LIMITS OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND GPT-3 IN PATENT PROSECUTION.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2022, v. 54, n. 2, p. 255
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: OCTOBER 1, 2015 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1281, doi. 10.18060/4806.1170
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE COMPLETENESS REQUIREMENT IN PATENT LAW.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 949
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Evolving Impact on Claim Construction.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Different Infringement, Different Issue: Altering Issue Preclusion as Applied to Claim Construction.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2011, v. 19, n. 3, p. 361
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
TECHNICAL FUNCTION DISCOVERY IN PATENT DATABASES FOR GENERATING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS.
- Published in:
- IADIS International Journal on Computer Science & Information Systems, 2016, v. 11, n. 2, p. 241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INDEFINITENESS.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 479
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
IS IT TIME FOR A RULE 11 FOR THE PATENT BAR?
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2013, v. 53, n. 3, p. 351
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents.
- Published in:
- GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2020, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1156, doi. 10.1093/grurint/ikaa135
- Publication type:
- Article
Vagueness of Patent Claim Language, Claim Construction and Patent Infringement – What a Mess!
- Published in:
- GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2020, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1097, doi. 10.1093/grurint/ikaa114
- Publication type:
- Article
Determinants of claim definiteness: myth of relative terms.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 10, p. 796, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz111
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Contracts, patents and chess--applying Arnold v Britton to patent claim construction.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw186
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
US Supreme Court rewrites standard for claim indefiniteness analysis.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 11, p. 874, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu152
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
So when is a patent claim too broad?
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 8, p. 578, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt088
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Of Fences and Definite Patent Boundaries.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2016, v. 18, n. 3, p. 563
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Judiciary's Material Impact on Materials Patents: Patent Eligible Subject Matter in the Chemical & Materials Industries.
- Published in:
- Penn State Law Review, 2023, v. 127, n. 2, p. 567
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
IN YOUR OWN DEFENSE: THE IMPORTANCE OF IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM WITH PATENTING UNDER THE "LAWS OF NATURE".
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 1, p. 196
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS WITH JUDICIALLY-IMPOSED PATENT-CLAIM LIMITATIONS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
RES OR RULES? PATENTS AND THE (UNCERTAIN) RULES OF THE GAME.
- Published in:
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 481
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Stealing fire: a retrospective survey of biotech patent claims in the wake of Mayo v. Prometheus.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 2012, v. 30, n. 8, p. 758, doi. 10.1038/nbt.2318
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article