The reform of drug patent system in Thailand.
- Published in:
- Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2017, v. 41, n. 1, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "PATENT applications -- Lawsuits %26 claims"
Results: 21
1
2
A Shenanigan in IPR Denials.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 3, p. 769
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
AFTER CHRISTIANSON: FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER INVENTORSHIP DISPUTES ABOUT PATENT APPLICATIONS.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 3, p. 1209
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
STANDING AGAINST BAD PATENTS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.15779/Z38GQ6R23P
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
THE "ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE" IN 1887.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.15779/Z38FT8DJ64
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 6, p. 41
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Eligible Subject Matter at the Patent Office: An Empirical Study of the Influence of Alice on Patent Examiners and Patent Applicants.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2020, v. 105, n. 2, p. 527
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
To Infinium and beyond! Questions regarding partial priority referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 4, p. 222, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv259
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Contradictions in time limitation in revocation of a granted patent under Kenya law.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 7, p. 537, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu091
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Application for central amendment of a patent after revocation at first instance does not of itself render an appeal an abuse of process.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 7, p. 538, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu074
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
When the description limits the scope of the invention: careful drafting really matters!
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 6, p. 448, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu054
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
What makes someone a de facto director?
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 6, p. 447, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
RUSSIAN STANDARD inherently registrable following Iceland appeal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 6, p. 450, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu055
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Incremental pharmaceutical innovation in India: the Supreme Court's judgment in the Novartis Gleevec case.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 10, p. 776, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt151
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
HYATT V. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA: PERILS OF UNDUE DISPUTING ZEAL AND UNDUE IMMUNITY FOR GOVERNMENT-INFLICTED INJURY.
- Published in:
- Nevada Law Journal, 2017, v. 18, n. 1, p. 61
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE RESURRECTION OF THE DUTY TO INQUIRE AFTER THERASENSE, INC. V. BECTON, DICKINSON & CO.
- Published in:
- Duke Law & Technology Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 1, p. 41
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
EXPOSING LATENT PATENT INFRINGEMENT.
- Published in:
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
JUDICIAL WISDOM OR PATENT ENVY? THE ELEVENTH, SEVENTH AND FEDERAL CIRCUITS' PATENT JURISDICTIONAL BATTLE.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 2, p. 303
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY AFTER PROMETHEUS.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1111
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
WAS DIEHR A FLOOR IN THE SYSTEM? A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS FOR TWO LANDMARK PATENT ELIGIBILITY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
- Published in:
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2018, v. 44, n. 2, p. 192
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
OVERCLAIMING IS CRIMINAL.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2017, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1417
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article