Works matching DE "PARENS patriae doctrine (Law)"
1
- Journal of Law & Health, 2024, v. 37, n. 2, p. 52
- PFEFFER BILLAUER, BARBARA
- Article
3
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2013, v. 11, n. 1, p. 97
- Article
4
- Liverpool Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1007/s10991-019-09235-x
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 44, n. 1, p. 339
- Article
6
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2016, v. 3, n. 3, p. 576, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsw039
- Article
7
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2015, v. 2, n. 2, p. 459, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsv028
- Article
8
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 3, p. 1089
- Article
9
- Family Court Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 3, p. 512, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12227
- Article
10
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2012, v. 42, n. 3, p. 831
- Article
11
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 1419
- Article
12
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 631
- Article
13
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 561, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.45.3.when
- Article
14
- William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 5, p. 1753
- Article
15
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2017, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247, doi. 10.3366/elr.2017.0416
- Carruthers, J M;
- Crawford, E B
- Article
16
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 1, p. 345
- Article
17
- Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 217
- Article
18
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
19
- Social Issues & Policy Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01034.x
- Brank, Eve M.;
- Scott, Leroy
- Article
21
- Canterbury Law Review, 2010, v. 16, p. 127
- Article
22
- Tennessee Law Review, 2021, v. 88, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
24
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 331
- RUSTAD, MICHAEL L.;
- KOENIG, THOMAS H.
- Article
25
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017, v. 45, n. 4, p. 688, doi. 10.1177/1073110517750608
- Article
26
- SMU Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 4, p. 759
- Article
27
- Cumberland Law Review, 2014, v. 44, n. 2, p. 181
- Article
28
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 189
- Article
29
- Australasian Canadian Studies, 1985, v. 3, p. 70
- Article
30
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 321
- Article
31
- Widener Law Review, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
32
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
33
- Duquesne Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
34
- Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 871
- Article
35
- Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 619
- Article
36
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1955
- Article
37
- Tulane Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 869
- Article
38
- Utah Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 1611
- Quinn, Mary Joy;
- Krooks, Howard S.
- Article
39
- Maryland Law Review, 2023, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1103
- Article
40
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2024, v. 32, n. 3, p. 331, doi. 10.1007/s10691-023-09539-4
- Article
41
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, v. 40, n. 4, p. 682, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqaa019
- Brown, Jonathan;
- Christie, Sarah
- Article
42
- Emory International Law Review, 2022, v. 36, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
43
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2021, v. 31, n. 2, p. 135
- Article
44
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2021, v. 116, n. 2, p. 515
- Article
45
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1309
- Article
46
- North Carolina Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1427
- HARBACH, MEREDITH JOHNSON
- Article
47
- Houston Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 2, p. 291
- Koenig, Thomas H.;
- Rustad, Michael L.
- Article
48
- Law & Psychology Review, 2020, v. 45, p. 223
- Article
49
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2012, v. 83, n. 2, p. 549
- Article
50
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 581
- Article