Works matching DE "ORIGINALISM (Constitutional interpretation)"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2025, v. 123, n. 6, p. 1185, doi. 10.36644/mlr.123.6.some
- Article
3
- Studia Histórica: Historia Moderna, 2022, v. 44, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.14201/shhmo2022441187217
- Article
4
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 28, doi. 10.1007/s12103-016-9354-6
- Buckler, Kevin;
- Gilmore, Elizabeth
- Article
5
- 2017
- Buckler, Kevin;
- Gilmore, Elizabeth
- Correction Notice
6
- Dartmouth Law Journal, 2022, v. 20, n. 2, p. 1
- AMARAL, CHRISTOPHER AARON
- Article
13
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.15779/Z38GQ6R246
- Article
14
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 2, p. 335, doi. 10.15779/Z38Z31NN40
- Bambauer, Jane R.;
- Bambauer, Derek E.
- Article
15
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
17
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1683
- Article
18
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2024, v. 16, n. 2, p. 244
- Article
19
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2017, v. 10, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
20
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2015, v. 7, n. 2, p. 157
- Article
21
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2020, v. 18, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
22
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2017, v. 16, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
23
- Jurisprudence, 2016, v. 7, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1080/20403313.2015.1065644
- Article
24
- Utah Bar Journal, 2012, v. 25, n. 3, p. 22
- Article
25
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2023, v. 28, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
26
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2021, v. 26, n. 2, p. 335
- Article
27
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 119
- Article
28
- European Journal of Women's Studies, 2017, v. 24, n. 4, p. 313, doi. 10.1177/1350506817719393
- Davis, Kathy;
- Zarkov, Dubravka
- Article
29
- UMKC Law Review, 2016, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
30
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 1181
- Article
31
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 749
- Article
32
- Touro Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 4, p. 747
- Article
33
- Touro Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 4, p. 741
- Article
34
- St. John's Law Review, 2022, v. 95, n. 4, p. 739
- Article
35
- St. John's Law Review, 2022, v. 95, n. 3, p. 739
- Article
36
- St. John's Law Review, 2019, v. 93, n. 3, p. 683
- Article
38
- American University Law Review, 2023, v. 72, n. 4, p. 1247
- GOMEZ-AROSTEGUI, H. TOMAS;
- BOTTOMLEY, SEAN
- Article
39
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1577
- Article
40
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1577
- Article
41
- San Diego Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 599
- Article
42
- San Diego Law Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 2, p. 575
- Article
43
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013, v. 11, n. 4, p. 842, doi. 10.1093/icon/mot049
- Article
44
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2024, v. 47, n. 2, p. 507
- JENKINS, MARY CATHERINE;
- TURNER-JONES, JULIETTE
- Article
45
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1299
- Article
46
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1243
- Article
47
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1217
- Article
48
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1197
- Article
49
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 983
- RODRIGUEZ-BLANCO, VERONICA
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1091
- Article