Works matching DE "ONLINE social networks -- Law %26 legislation"
1
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2013, v. 90, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.1177/1077699013482913
- Stewart, Daxton R. "Chip"
- Article
2
- Computer und Recht, 2021, v. 37, n. 7, p. r79, doi. 10.9785/cr-2021-370720
- Article
3
- Touro Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 427
- Article
4
- Cinema Journal, 2009, v. 48, n. 4, p. 118, doi. 10.1353/cj.0.0144
- Article
5
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2018, v. 27, n. 3, p. 284, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2018.1517434
- Jadalhaq, Iyad Mohammad;
- Alqodsi, Enas Mohammad
- Article
6
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
7
- Media International Australia (8/1/07-current), 2021, v. 180, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1177/1329878X211010773
- O'Regan, Tom;
- Balnaves, Mark
- Article
8
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
9
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2014, v. 18, n. 3, p. 406, doi. 10.3366/elr.2014.0234
- Article
10
- International Journal of Law & Information Technology, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 254, doi. 10.1093/ijlit/eau002
- Wauters, Ellen;
- Lievens, Eva;
- Valcke, Peggy
- Article
12
- Mercer Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 2, p. 697
- Article
13
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 617
- Article
14
- Cornell Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1533
- Article
15
- Tennessee Law Review, 2012, v. 79, n. 4, p. 851
- Article
16
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
17
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 9, p. 14
- Article
18
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2011, v. 68, n. 1, p. 64
- Article
19
- Chicago Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 20, n. 1, p. 252
- Article
20
- Marquette Law Review, 2019, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1045
- Article
21
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 8, p. 685, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx114
- Article
22
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1255
- Article
23
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1695
- Article
24
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
25
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1809
- Article
26
- Widener Law Review, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 259
- WAGNER, WILLIAM;
- CASTILLO, JOSHUA R.
- Article
27
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 2, p. 455
- Article
28
- Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
29
- Syracuse Law Review, 2013, v. 63, n. 2, p. 227
- Article
30
- Syracuse Law Review, 2013, v. 63, n. 2, p. 199
- Leonard, Cohn M.;
- Hendry, Tyler T.
- Article
31
- Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1413
- Pasquale, Frank;
- Citron, Danielle Keats
- Article
32
- Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 2010, v. 13, n. 2, p. 121
- Hooper, Tony;
- Evans, Tyrone Bard
- Article
33
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2011, v. 72, n. 4, p. 881
- Article
34
- Connecticut Law Review, 2012, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1693
- Article
35
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2011, v. 47, n. 10, p. 30
- Article
36
- Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueño, 2011, v. 51, n. 1, p. 133
- Rivera, Catherine Dimargie González
- Article
37
- University of Miami Law Review, 2014, v. 68, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
40
- Police Journal, 2014, v. 87, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
41
- Maryland Law Review, 2016, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1127
- Article
42
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2012, v. 3, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
43
- Chinese Law & Government, 2010, v. 43, n. 5, p. 83, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609430514
- Article
44
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, v. 69, n. 3, p. 1715
- Article
45
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, v. 69, n. 2, p. 1259
- Article
46
- Internal Auditor, 2015, v. 72, n. 1, p. 36
- Levy, Michael;
- Leusner, Anthony;
- Wasti, Khalid
- Article
47
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 663
- Article
48
- Vermont Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
49
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 1, p. 141
- Article
50
- North Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 5, p. 1807
- Article