Works matching DE "OBVIOUSNESS (Patent law)"

Results: 37

INDIA'S CRACK DOWN ON THE PRACTICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL EVERGREENING: THE 2013 NOVARTIS DECISION.

Published in:

UMKC Law Review, 2016, v. 85, n. 1, p. 503

By:

Patel, Joli

Publication type:

Article

2014 PATENT LAW DECISIONS ON KEY ISSUES AT THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.

Published in:

American University Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 735

By:

LUK, OLIVIA T.;
BASU, PALASH;
DOOLEY, RYAN;
GREEN, CHARLES;
HAAN, BRIAN E.;
KIM, GINA;
SZPONDOWSKI, KARA L.

Publication type:

Article

2011 PATENT LAW DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.

Published in:

American University Law Review, 2012, v. 61, n. 4, p. 785

By:

Pollock, Robert A.;
Wadler, Linda A.;
Litowtiz, Robert D.;
Craig, Joyce;
Gerstenblith, Bart A.;
Szakaly, Christina;
Zhenyu Yang;
Ehrenfried, Mindy L.

Publication type:

Article

PREDICTABILITY AND NONOBVIOUSNESS IN PATENT LAW AFTER KSR.

Published in:

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 391

By:

Cotropia, Christopher A.

Publication type:

Article

A Nonobvious Comparison: Nonobviousness Decisions at the PTAB and in the Federal Courts.

Published in:

Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 403

By:

Mande, Gregory N.

Publication type:

Article

Patent Protection in Medicine and Biotechnology: An Overview.

Published in:

Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, 2011, v. 4, n. 3, p. 106

By:

Chen, Stephen W.;
Len, Marina;
Levy, Seth D.

Publication type:

Article

A Network Theory of Patentability.

Published in:

University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 1, p. 63

By:

Pedraza-Fariña, Laura G.;
Whalen, Ryan

Publication type:

Article

TAKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BEYOND THE TURING TEST.

Published in:

Wisconsin Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 4, p. 873

By:

REINBOLD, PATRIC M.

Publication type:

Article

SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS IN NONOBVIOUSNESS ANALYSIS: THE USE OF OBJECTIVE INDICIA FOLLOWING KSR V. TELEFLEX.

Published in:

New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 6, p. 2070

By:

Thomas, Natalie A.

Publication type:

Article

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INVENTIVE STEP UNDER THE EUROPEAN PATENT CONVENTION RELATED TO THE INCREASING APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CERTIFICATION AS A SUI GENERIS PROTECTION MECHANISM FOR CREATIONS INVOLVING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.

Published in:

International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2023, v. 9, n. 1, p. 139, doi. 10.13165/j.icj.2023.06.010

By:

Rudzite, Liva

Publication type:

Article

RULES, STANDARDS, AND THE REALITY OF OBVIOUSNESS.

Published in:

Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 25

By:

Simon, Brenda M.

Publication type:

Article

APPLES ARE NOT COMMON SENSE IN VIEW OF ORANGES: TIME TO REFORM KSR'S ILLUSORY OBVIOUSNESS STANDARD?

Published in:

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2010, v. 21, n. 1, p. 49

By:

Le Duc, Timothy J.

Publication type:

Article

CRISPR HAS ALREADY REVOLUTIONIZED GENETICS, WHY NOT THE OBVIOUSNESS STANDARD TOO?

Published in:

University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1

By:

Schroder, Kris

Publication type:

Article

OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING:WHY IT EXISTS AND WHEN IT APPLIES.

Published in:

Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1017

By:

Kazhdan, Daniel

Publication type:

Article

THE ROAD TO TRANSPARENCY: ABOLISHING BLACK-BOX VERDICTS ON PATENT OBVIOUSNESS.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 171

By:

Ghosh, Indraneel

Publication type:

Article

PROGRESS AND COMPETITION IN DESIGN.

Published in:

Stanford Technology Law Review, 2013, p. 1

By:

McKenna, Mark P.;
Strandburg, Katherine J.

Publication type:

Article

Isn't It Obvious? How Klein's Definition of Analogous Prior Art Conflicts with the Supreme Court's Vision for Obviousness.

Published in:

Iowa Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1377

By:

Rollins, Samantha M.

Publication type:

Article

Obviousness: what's the problem?

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 9, p. 667, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz082

By:

Marsh, Roy

Publication type:

Article

Non-Obviousness and Screening.

Published in:

Journal of Industrial Economics, 2013, v. 61, n. 3, p. 700, doi. 10.1111/joie.12031

By:

Kou, Zonglai;
Rey, Patrick;
Wang, Tong

Publication type:

Article

A NEW FORMULA FOR ANALYZING FORMULATION-PATENT OBVIOUSNESS.

Published in:: 2011
Publication type:: Opinion

Protecting Nanotechnology Inventions: Prosecuting in an Unpredictable World.

Published in:

Nanotechnology Law & Business, 2010, v. 7, n. 3, p. 223

By:

Mills, Jeffrey K.;
Fitzsimmons, Jason A.;
Rodkey, Kevin

Publication type:

Article

DEPENDENT ON THE JURY: ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS OF DEPENDENT PATENT CLAIMS AND IRRECONCILABLE JURY VERDICTS.

Published in:

Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 1, p. 419

By:

Bickley, Patrick

Publication type:

Article

OBVIOUSNESS GUIDANCE AT THE PTO.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2016, v. 5, n. 2, p. 306

By:

WEN XUE

Publication type:

Article

NOT SO OBVIOUS AFTER ALL: PATENT LAW'S NONOBVIOUSNESS REQUIREMENT, KSR, AND THE FEAR OF HINDSIGHT BIAS.

Published in:

Georgia Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 41

By:

Lunney, Jr., Glynn S.;
Johnson, Christian T.

Publication type:

Article

VISUAL INVENTION.

Published in:

Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2012, v. 16, n. 1, p. 169

By:

Burstein, Sarah

Publication type:

Article

Patent Disclosures and Time.

Published in:

Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1459

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

Everything Is Obvious.

Published in:

UCLA Law Review, 2019, v. 66, n. 1, p. 2

By:

Abbott, Ryan

Publication type:

Article

SPECIAL VERDICTS: AN OBVIOUS TRIAL PROCEDURE FOR DECIDING OBVIOUSNESS IN PATENT LITIGATION.

Published in:

2011

By:

Guo, John

Publication type:

Opinion

OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING - A SURPRISING IMPEDIMENT TO COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

Published in:

Business Law Review (15337421), 2013, v. 46, p. 63

By:

SILVERSTEIN, DAVID

Publication type:

Article

UNCREATIVE DESIGNS.

Published in:

Duke Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 7, p. 1437

By:

BURSTEIN, SARAH

Publication type:

Article

PATENT ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS AS POSSESSION.

Published in:

Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 987

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

COMBATING HINDSIGHT RECONSTRUCTION IN PATENT PROSECUTION.

Published in:

Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1137

By:

BOLT, ASHLEY ALLMAN

Publication type:

Article

Reconsidering the U.S. Patent System: Lessons from Generics.

Published in:

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2012, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1249

By:

Chen, Molly F. M.

Publication type:

Article

USING SIGNAL THEORY TO DETERMINE NONOBVIOUSNESS OF INVENTIONS.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 241

By:

O'Brien, Michael;
Molina, Idonah

Publication type:

Article

RECENT SUPREME COURT CASES MAY REQUIRE MORE DEFERENCE IN REVIEW OF OBVIOUSNESS CASES.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2016, v. 56, n. 1, p. 1

By:

ALDRICH, NIKA

Publication type:

Article

INDEFINITENESS.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 479

By:

MAHANTA, SANJEEV K.

Publication type:

Article

GRAHAM V. JOHN DEERE CO. IN A DIFFERENT LIGHT.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 51, n. 4, p. 649

By:

Walterscheid, Edward C.

Publication type:

Article