Found: 37
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
UNCREATIVE DESIGNS.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 7, p. 1437
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INVENTIVE STEP UNDER THE EUROPEAN PATENT CONVENTION RELATED TO THE INCREASING APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CERTIFICATION AS A SUI GENERIS PROTECTION MECHANISM FOR CREATIONS INVOLVING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
- Published in:
- International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2023, v. 9, n. 1, p. 139, doi. 10.13165/j.icj.2023.06.010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
TAKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BEYOND THE TURING TEST.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 4, p. 873
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Network Theory of Patentability.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 1, p. 63
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING:WHY IT EXISTS AND WHEN IT APPLIES.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Obviousness: what's the problem?
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 9, p. 667, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz082
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Everything Is Obvious.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2019, v. 66, n. 1, p. 2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CRISPR HAS ALREADY REVOLUTIONIZED GENETICS, WHY NOT THE OBVIOUSNESS STANDARD TOO?
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patent Disclosures and Time.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1459
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Nonobvious Comparison: Nonobviousness Decisions at the PTAB and in the Federal Courts.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 403
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INDIA'S CRACK DOWN ON THE PRACTICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL EVERGREENING: THE 2013 NOVARTIS DECISION.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2016, v. 85, n. 1, p. 503
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PATENT ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS AS POSSESSION.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 987
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
OBVIOUSNESS GUIDANCE AT THE PTO.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2016, v. 5, n. 2, p. 306
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
USING SIGNAL THEORY TO DETERMINE NONOBVIOUSNESS OF INVENTIONS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
RECENT SUPREME COURT CASES MAY REQUIRE MORE DEFERENCE IN REVIEW OF OBVIOUSNESS CASES.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2016, v. 56, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
2014 PATENT LAW DECISIONS ON KEY ISSUES AT THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 735
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
COMBATING HINDSIGHT RECONSTRUCTION IN PATENT PROSECUTION.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
RULES, STANDARDS, AND THE REALITY OF OBVIOUSNESS.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 25
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INDEFINITENESS.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 479
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PREDICTABILITY AND NONOBVIOUSNESS IN PATENT LAW AFTER KSR.
- Published in:
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 391
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Non-Obviousness and Screening.
- Published in:
- Journal of Industrial Economics, 2013, v. 61, n. 3, p. 700, doi. 10.1111/joie.12031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PROGRESS AND COMPETITION IN DESIGN.
- Published in:
- Stanford Technology Law Review, 2013, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING - A SURPRISING IMPEDIMENT TO COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
- Published in:
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2013, v. 46, p. 63
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Isn't It Obvious? How Klein's Definition of Analogous Prior Art Conflicts with the Supreme Court's Vision for Obviousness.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1377
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Reconsidering the U.S. Patent System: Lessons from Generics.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2012, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
NOT SO OBVIOUS AFTER ALL: PATENT LAW'S NONOBVIOUSNESS REQUIREMENT, KSR, AND THE FEAR OF HINDSIGHT BIAS.
- Published in:
- Georgia Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 41
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
2011 PATENT LAW DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2012, v. 61, n. 4, p. 785
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
VISUAL INVENTION.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2012, v. 16, n. 1, p. 169
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS IN NONOBVIOUSNESS ANALYSIS: THE USE OF OBJECTIVE INDICIA FOLLOWING KSR V. TELEFLEX.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 6, p. 2070
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
GRAHAM V. JOHN DEERE CO. IN A DIFFERENT LIGHT.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 51, n. 4, p. 649
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patent Protection in Medicine and Biotechnology: An Overview.
- Published in:
- Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, 2011, v. 4, n. 3, p. 106
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SPECIAL VERDICTS: AN OBVIOUS TRIAL PROCEDURE FOR DECIDING OBVIOUSNESS IN PATENT LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
A NEW FORMULA FOR ANALYZING FORMULATION-PATENT OBVIOUSNESS.
- Published in:
- 2011
- Publication type:
- Opinion
DEPENDENT ON THE JURY: ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS OF DEPENDENT PATENT CLAIMS AND IRRECONCILABLE JURY VERDICTS.
- Published in:
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 1, p. 419
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE ROAD TO TRANSPARENCY: ABOLISHING BLACK-BOX VERDICTS ON PATENT OBVIOUSNESS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 171
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
APPLES ARE NOT COMMON SENSE IN VIEW OF ORANGES: TIME TO REFORM KSR'S ILLUSORY OBVIOUSNESS STANDARD?
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2010, v. 21, n. 1, p. 49
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Protecting Nanotechnology Inventions: Prosecuting in an Unpredictable World.
- Published in:
- Nanotechnology Law & Business, 2010, v. 7, n. 3, p. 223
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article