WHY AND HOW NEW YORK SHOULD ENACT MANDATORY STATEWIDE EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 3, p. 1525
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "NEIL v. Biggers (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 4
1
2
IRREPARABLE MISIDENTIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY: REASSESSING THE THRESHOLD FOR ADMISSIBILITY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
A CALL FOR PRECEDENTIAL HEADS: WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE IS ANACHRONISTIC AND OUT-OF-STEP WITH THE EMPIRICAL REALITY.
- Published in:
- Law & Psychology Review, 2007, v. 31, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Voluntary Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices by Local Law Enforcement: Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
- Published in:
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2017, v. 20, n. 3, p. 509
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article