Practical Implications of Murphy Oil on Employee Waivers: An Ecological Disaster or a Dissenter's Pipeline to Freedom?Published in:Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 5, p. 38By:Mall, Laura L.Publication type:Article
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., No. 05-436 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 30, 2007).Published in:Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2008, v. 22, n. 1, p. 37By:Lee, MachellePublication type:Article
RECONSIDERING RECUSALS: THE NEED FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEN NOT TO RECUSE.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2013, v. 59, n. 4, p. 947By:Lowe, Mason E.Publication type:Article
STANDING FOR PRIVATE PARTIES IN GLOBAL WARMING CASES: TRACEABLE STANDING CAUSATION DOES NOT REQUIRE PROXIMATE CAUSATION.Published in:Michigan State Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 869By:Mank, Bradford C.Publication type:Article
Decision by Recusal: Comer v. Murphy Oil USA Lets Naysayers and Disqualified Judges in the Fifth Circuit Determine the Outcome of a Case Without a Hearing.Published in:Tulane Law Review, 2011, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1131Publication type:Article
Tracing the Origins of Fairly Traceable : The Black Hole of Private Climate Change Litigation.Published in:Tulane Law Review, 2010, v. 85, n. 2, p. 477By:Nagle, Mary KathrynPublication type:Article