Works matching DE "MULLANE v. Central Hanover Bank %26 Trust Co. (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 6
“HACKING” SERVICE OF PROCESS: USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO PROVIDE CONSTITUTIONALLY SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF PROCESS.
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 4, p. 559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
LANDLORD PROTECTION LAW REVISITED: THE AMENDMENTS TO THE ARKANSAS RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD-TENANT ACT OF 2007, ARK. CODE ANN. §§ 18-17-101 ET SEQ.
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SOLVING SEWER SERVICE: FIGHTING FRAUD WITH TECHNOLOGY.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 4, p. 813
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Notice Requirements in California Probate Proceedings.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1978, v. 66, n. 5, p. 1111, doi. 10.2307/3479907
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT: WHY NOTICE BY NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION FAILS TO MEET MULLANE'S DESIRE-TO-INFORM STANDARD AND HOW MODERN TECHNOLOGY PROVIDES A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE.
- Published in:
- Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Balancing Equation for Social Media Publication Notice.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 4, p. 2163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article