Works matching DE "MORAL distance"
1
- Social Theory & Practice, 2015, v. 41, n. 3, p. 527, doi. 10.5840/soctheorpract201541327
- Article
2
- Chinese Journal of Communication, 2024, v. 17, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.1080/17544750.2023.2218646
- Rong Wang;
- Zhou, Alvin;
- Kinneer, Tabitha H.
- Article
3
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
4
- Philosophical Forum, 2005, v. 36, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2005.00187.x
- Article
5
- Judgment & Decision Making, 2012, v. 7, n. 5, p. 628, doi. 10.1017/s1930297500006343
- Han Gong;
- Medin, Douglas L.
- Article
6
- Monist, 2003, v. 86, n. 3, p. 327
- Article
7
- Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, v. 159, n. 3, p. 817, doi. 10.1007/s10551-018-3827-0
- Sampath, Vijay S.;
- Rahman, Noushi
- Article
8
- Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, v. 124, n. 2, p. 259, doi. 10.1007/s10551-013-1865-1
- Huber, Christian;
- Munro, Iain
- Article
9
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2014, v. 19, n. 4, p. 389
- Article
10
- Antipode, 2019, v. 51, n. 4, p. 1251, doi. 10.1111/anti.12531
- May, Jon;
- Williams, Andrew;
- Cloke, Paul;
- Cherry, Liev
- Article
11
- European Journal of Philosophy, 2022, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1282, doi. 10.1111/ejop.12727
- Article
13
- Social Cognition, 2009, v. 27, n. 2, p. 261, doi. 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.261
- Agerström, Jens;
- Björklund, Fredrik
- Article
14
- Philosophical Studies, 2021, v. 178, n. 10, p. 3085, doi. 10.1007/s11098-020-01571-3
- Article