PATENT MONOPOLIES AND THE LAW.
- Published in:
- Management Review, 1967, v. 56, n. 8, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "MONOPOLY laws"
Results: 152
1
2
The Case for Preemptive Oligopoly Regulation.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2021, v. 96, n. 3, p. 751
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
China's Anti-Monopoly Law and its Merger Enforcement: Convergence and Flexibility.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Economic Law, 2011, v. 14, n. 4, p. 807, doi. 10.1093/jiel/jgr032
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Regulations of Digital Platform Markets Under the Japanese Antimonopoly Act: Does the Regulation of Unfair Trade Practices Solve the Gordian Knot of Digital Markets?
- Published in:
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2020, v. 65, n. 1, p. 102, doi. 10.1177/0003603X19898905
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Competition law and policy of the Republic of Korea.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 3, p. 621, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400304
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The new Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law: A survey of a work in progress.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 3, p. 579, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400303
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Foreign Investment in China: Will the Anti- Monopoly Law be a Barrier or a Facilitator?
- Published in:
- Texas International Law Journal, 2009, v. 45, n. 1, p. 127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
REINTRODUCING INTENT INTO PREDATORY PRICING LAW.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 61, n. 4, p. 903
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
China's Choice of Analytical Models for Its Anti-Monopoly Law.
- Published in:
- Social Sciences in China, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 34, doi. 10.1080/02529203.2018.1414404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
A Rhetorical Response to Boldrin & Levine: Against Intellectual (Property) Extremism.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Economics, 2009, v. 5, n. 3, p. 1081, doi. 10.2202/1555-5879.1440
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
NO-FAULT DIGITAL PLATFORM MONOPOLIZATION.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2020, v. 61, n. 3, p. 755
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
January could signal U.S. antitrust policy shift.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 12, p. 1835
- Publication type:
- Article
13
CINCO AÑOS DE APLICACIÓN DE LA LEY DE DEFENSA DE LA COMPETENCIA.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2012, n. 33, p. 82
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
EL PROCEDIMIENTO SANCIONADOR EN EL NUEVO REGLAMENTO DE DEFENSA DE LA COMPETENCIA.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2008, n. 20, p. 43
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The Consequences of Search Bias: How Application of the Essential Facilities Doctrine Remedies Google's Unrestricted Monopoly on Search in the United States and Europe.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 721
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Anticompetitive Bundled Discounts: A Way Out of the Wilderness.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2012, v. 37, n. 4, p. 951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Global Business and Competition Law in India.
- Published in:
- Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 2014, v. 9, n. 2, p. 173
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Access to Information in South Korean Competition Law Proceedings: Investigated Firms Must Assert Their Rights.
- Published in:
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2021, v. 12, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpaa075
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
BORK'S BOWMAN: "NOT GONE, BUT FORGOTTEN".
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
20
MARKET DEFINITION: IMPOSSIBLE AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
21
THE PROTECTED PROFITS BENCHMARK: A REFUSAL TO DEAL METRIC?
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2012, v. 78, n. 3, p. 689
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
ANTITRUST IMMUNITY GRANTS TO JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE ALLIANCES.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2012, v. 78, n. 2, p. 443
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
IN REGULATORS WE TRUST: THE SUPREME COURT'S NEW APPROACH TO IMPLIED ANTITRUST IMMUNITY.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2012, v. 78, n. 2, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
AFTERWORD: THE PURPOSES OF ANTITRUST REMEDIES.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2009, v. 76, n. 1, p. 359
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
BARGAINING IN THE SHADOW OF RATE-SETTING COURTS.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
26
MONOPOLIZATION FOLLIES: THE DANGERS OF STRUCTURAL REMEDIES UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2009, v. 76, n. 1, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
THINKING OUTSIDE THE ILLINOIS BRICK BOX: A PROPOSAL FOR REFORM.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2009, v. 76, n. 1, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
THE CASE FOR ANTITRUST CIVIL PENALTIES.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2009, v. 76, n. 1, p. 127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
DETREBLING ANTITRUST DAMAGES IN MONOPOLIZATION CASES.
- Published in:
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2009, v. 76, n. 1, p. 97
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
PRO-COMPETITIVE OR PROTECTIVE? THE CHINESE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW, IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES, AND BILATERAL ANTITRUST COOPERATION AS AN EFFECTIVE RESPONSE.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2010, v. 18, n. 2, p. 527
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Monopolies in Multidistrict Litigation.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 67
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
STANDARD OIL AND U.S. STEEL: PREDATION AND COLLUSION IN THE LAW OF MONOPOLIZATION AND MERGERS.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
33
REMEDIES FOR MONOPOLIZATION FROM STANDARD OIL TO MICROSOFT AND INTEL: THE CHANGING NATURE OF MONOPOLY LAW FROM ELIMINATION OF MARKET POWER TO REGULATION OF ITS USE.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 815
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Confucianism and Antitrust: China's Emerging Evolutionary Approach to Anti-Monopoly Law.
- Published in:
- International Lawyer, 2013, v. 47, n. 2, p. 193
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
China.
- Published in:
- International Lawyer, 2009, v. 43, n. 2, p. 1073
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
What's Behind the War on Big Tech? Rent seekers are trying to use government to hamper Google, Amazon, Apple, and others.
- Published in:
- Regulation, 2021, v. 44, n. 3, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Big Tech's Digital Robber Barons: Are these firms really harming us, or are they just successful?
- Published in:
- Regulation, 2021, v. 44, n. 3, p. 26
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT AS A MODEL OF REGULATION.
- Published in:
- Marquette Law Review, 2012, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
How Far Can the Anti-Monopoly Enforcement Agencies Go When Adopting Commitment Decisions? The Need to Safeguard the Commitment Procedure Under the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law.
- Published in:
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2017, v. 8, n. 3, p. 178, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpw096
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
The Application of Article 102 TFEU by the European Commission and the European Courts.
- Published in:
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2016, v. 7, n. 4, p. 288, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpw017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
The Current State of Russian Competition Law in the Context of its Harmonisation with EU Competition Law.
- Published in:
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2014, v. 5, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpt059
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Pay-For-Delay Practices in the Pharmaceutical Sector: Lundbeck, Actavis, and Others.
- Published in:
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2014, v. 5, n. 1, p. 44, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpt071
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Intervention of State in Monopoly Prevention as a Potential Danger in Limitation of Author's Rights.
- Published in:
- Novi Sad Faculty of Law: Collected Papers / Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 193, doi. 10.5937/zrpfns47-3260
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
The Economics of Distinctiveness: The Road to Monopolization in Trade Mark Law.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 3, p. 321
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
The Soft law acts of the UOKiK President and their impact on determining the situation of an entrepreneur in anti-monopoly proceedings.
- Published in:
- Ius Novum, 2024, v. 18, n. 3, p. 78, doi. 10.2478/in-2024-0024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
DAWN OF A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ERA OR OPPORTUNITY WASTED? AN INTELLECTUAL REAPPRAISAL OF CHINA'S ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2010, v. 24, n. 1, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
American Fair Trade: Proprietary Capitalism, Corporatism, and the "New Competition," 1890—1940.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
48
Legal status of public enterprises and commercial monopolies in the European Union.
- Published in:
- Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica, 2013, v. 3, n. 1, p. 90
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Negativing Invention.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 1091
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
SANAYİ DEVRİMİ'NİN TARTIŞ MALI BİR KURUMU OLARAK PATENT VE OSMANLI'DA İHTİRA BERATI KANUNU.
- Published in:
- Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article