The End of Mandatory Juvenile Life Without Parole.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2014, v. 25, n. 5, p. 553, doi. 10.1177/0887403413478159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "MILLER v. Alabama"
Results: 111
1
2
Risk assessment and juvenile resentencing: A critical analysis.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
3
Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
4
FALCON V. STATE: SHOULD THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT HAVE OPENED THE DOOR FOR SENTENCING REVIEW OF JUVENILES SENTENCED TO LIFE IN PRISON FOR MURDER?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
THE GROWING PAINS OF GRAHAM V. FLORIDA'. DECIPHERING WHETHER LENGTHY TERM-OF-YEARS SENTENCES FOR JUVENILE DEFENDANTS CAN EQUATE TO THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SENTENCE OF LIFE WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 2, p. 182
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
THE IMPORTANCE OF AN EXPANSIVE DEFERENCE TO MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 22, n. 1, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE TRILOGY AND BEYOND.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 3, p. 539
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
KIDS CAN CHANGE: REFORMING SOUTH DAKOTA'S JUVENILE TRANSFER LAW TO REHABILITATE CHILDREN AND PROTECT PUBLIC SAFETY.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 2, p. 312
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
CRIMINAL LAW--SENTENCING JUVENILES-- WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? MANDATORY SENTENCING AND RETROACTIVE A PPLICATION POST-MILLER. MILLER V. ALABAMA, 132 S. CT. 2455 (2012).
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Implementing Proportionality.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Instilling Hope: Suggested Legislative Reform for Missouri Regarding Juvenile Sentencing Pursuant to Supreme Court Decisions in Miller and Montgomery.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Precedent as a Policy Map: What Miller v. Alabama Tells Us About Emerging Adults and the Direction of Contemporary Youth Services.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Mill(er)ing Mandatory Minimums: What Federal Lawmakers Should Take from Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1147
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Not Just Kid Stuff? Extending Graham and Miller to Adults.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1087
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Eighth Amendment Differentness.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1053
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Miller v. Alabama: What It Is, What It May Be, and What It Is Not.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Juvenile Lifers and Judicial Overreach: A Curmudgeonly Meditation on Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Symposium: Bombshell or Babystep? The Ramifications of Miller v. Alabama for Sentencing Law and Juvenile Crime Policy.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The Other "Missouri Model": Systemic Juvenile Injustice in the Show-Me State.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1193
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Precedent as a Policy Map: What Miller v. Alabama Tells Us About Emerging Adults and the Direction of Contemporary Youth Services.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Not Just Kid Stuff? Extending Graham and Miller to Adults.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1087
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Eighth Amendment Differentness.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1053
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Miller v. Alabama: What It Is, What It May Be, and What It Is Not.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Juvenile Lifers and Judicial Overreach: A Curmudgeonly Meditation on Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Symposium: Bombshell or Babystep? The Ramifications of Miller v. Alabama for Sentencing Law and Juvenile Crime Policy.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Florida State University Law Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 4, p. 853
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Cruel and Unusual Parole.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2017, v. 95, n. 3, p. 707
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
JUVENILE SENTENCING POST -MILLER: PREVENTIVE AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
WHAT ROUGH BEAST AWAITS? GRAHAM, MILLER, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S SEEMINGLY INEVITABLE SLOUCH TOWARDS COMPLETE ABOLITION OF JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 3, p. 671
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL BEFORE AND AFTER 2012: MILLER V. ALABAMA MUST APPLY RETROACTIVELY.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
MILLER IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT: WHAT THE STORIES OF SIX JUVENILE LIFERS REVEAL ABOUT THE NEED FOR NEW FEDERAL JUVENILE SENTENCING POLICY.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2020, v. 44, n. 4, p. 581
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
MITIGATING AFTER MILLER: LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS AND REMEDIES FOR THE FUTURE OF JUVENILE SENTENCING.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2013, v. 93, n. 6, p. 2095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
BOARD TO DEATH: DE FACTO JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2020, v. 47, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
BOARD TO DEATH: DE FACTO JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2020, v. 47, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Juvenile Justice's Second Chance: Untangling the Retroactive Application of Miller v . Alabama Under the Teague Doctrine.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
REDEEMING JUSTICE.
- Published in:
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2021, v. 116, n. 2, p. 315
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
The Continued Viability of New York's Juvenile Offender Act in Light of Recent National Developments.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 3, p. 595
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
LIKE TAKING CANDY FROM A BABY: THE EFFECTS OF REMOVING JUVENILE SENTENCING AUTHORITY FROM THE LEGISLATURE.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 3, p. 675
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Evading Miller.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2015, v. 39, n. 1, p. 85
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Sentencing Children Who Kill: One Giant Leap for the US Supreme Court, One Small Step for International Human Rights Law.
- Published in:
- Human Rights Law Review, 2012, v. 12, n. 4, p. 801, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngs032
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
FROM PIONEER TO PUNISHER: AMERICA'S QUEST TO FIND ITS JUVENILE JUSTICE IDENTITY.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
42
AMERICAN EVIL: A Response to Kleinfeld on Punishment.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2018, v. 50, n. 1, p. 179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
PROVIDING A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR RELEASE: A PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVING WASHINGTON'S MILLER-FIX.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 1053
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
MILLER'S PROMISE: RE-EVALUATING EXTREME CRIMINAL SENTENCES FOR CHILDREN.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 963
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
CONFUSION IN MONTGOMERY'S WAKE: STATE RESPONSES, THE MANDATES OF MONTGOMERY, AND WHY A COMPLETE CATEGORICAL BAN ON LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE FOR JUVENILES IS THE ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION.
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
A Suggested Minor Refinement of Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 4, p. 907
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
MISSOURI'S PATH TOWARDS "A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR RELEASE." SHOULD REMEDYING UNCONSTITUTIONAL SENTENCES PERMIT JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PAROLE BOARD DECISIONS?
- Published in:
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2021, v. 65, n. 3, p. 727
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
The Miller Revolution.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1787
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
No Child Left Alone: Why Iowa Should Ban Juvenile Solitary Confinement.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 3, p. 1259
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
“Let's Change the Law”: Arkansas and the Puzzle of Juvenile Justice Reform in the 1990s.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay