Criteria for science in the courts.
- Published in:
- 1993
- Publication type:
- Editorial
Works matching DE "MERRELL Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc."
Results: 27
1
2
UNCERTAINTY AND INFORMED CHOICE: UNMASKING DAUBERT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2005, v. 104, n. 2, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
FOLK PSYCHOLOGY WINS THE DAY! Daubert and the Challenge of False Confessions.
- Published in:
- Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 2017, v. 24, n. 3, p. 269, doi. 10.1353/ppp.2017.0038
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Opening the Gates to Scientific Evidence in Toxic Exposure Cases: Medical Monitoring and Daubert.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 1998, v. 17, n. 3, p. 551
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Expert Witnessing & Daubert.
- Published in:
- Forensic Examiner, 2000, v. 9, n. 3/4, p. 15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Standards for Expert Evidence Admissibility.
- Published in:
- Forensic Examiner, 1996, v. 5, n. 9/10, p. 16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Court ruling on `junk science' gives judges more say about what expert witness testimony to allow.
- Published in:
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 1993, v. 270, n. 4, p. 423, doi. 10.1001/jama.1993.03510040023007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
From the Food and Drug Administration.
- Published in:
- 1991
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
9
The Presentation of Testing Evidence in Court Cases.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2009, v. 41, n. 2, p. 283
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Key Witness Against Morning Sickness Drug Faces Scientific Fraud Charges.
- Published in:
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990, v. 263, n. 11, p. 1468, doi. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440110020003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
"DO YOU HEAR WHAT I HEAR?": EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON EARWITNESS TESTIMONY.
- Published in:
- Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 2011, v. 17, n. 2, p. 123, doi. 10.37419/twlr.v17.i2.2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Reflections on Daubert: A Look Back at the Supreme Court's Decision.
- Published in:
- Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, 2015, v. 15, p. 1, doi. 10.5840/jpsl20151511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Falsifiability Revisited: Popper, Daubert, and Kuhn.
- Published in:
- Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, 2015, v. 15, p. 5, doi. 10.5840/jpsl20151512
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Of Witches, Madmen, and Products Liability: An Historical Survey of the Use of Expert Testimony.
- Published in:
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1995, v. 13, n. 2, p. 131, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2370130202
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Behavioral Science Evidence in the Wake of Daubert.
- Published in:
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1995, v. 13, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2370130201
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
ORGANIZED COMMON SENSE: SOME LESSONS FROM JUDGE JACK WEINSTEIN S UNCOMMONLY SENSIBLE APPROACH TO EXPERT EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- DePaul Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 2, p. 421
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Drug not guilty says court.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1985, p. 209, doi. 10.1038/314209b0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Expert Opinions in Environmental Litigation: Gatekeeping Twelve Years after Daubert.
- Published in:
- Environmental Forensics, 2005, v. 6, n. 3, p. 219, doi. 10.1080/15275920500194340
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Daubert and Its Discontents.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 76, n. 1, p. 131
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, CAUSATION AND THE LAW—LESSONS OF BENDECTIN (DEBENDOX) LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- Medical Law Review, 1996, v. 4, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/4.1.32
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
ADMITTING LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) EVIDENCE IN TEXAS: A CALL FOR STATEWIDE JUDICIAL NOTICE.
- Published in:
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2011, v. 42, n. 3, p. 837
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
State Variations on the Daubert Theme: Texas.
- Published in:
- FICC Quarterly, 2000, v. 51, n. 1, p. 63
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
State Variations on the Daubert Theme: California.
- Published in:
- FICC Quarterly, 2000, v. 51, n. 1, p. 27
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
The Expert Witness: The Impact of Kuhmo.
- Published in:
- Surveying & Land Information Science, 2004, v. 64, n. 1, p. 17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Pleading Guilty to Innocence: How Faulty Field Tests Provide False Evidence of Guilt.
- Published in:
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2019, v. 24, n. 1, p. 143
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Ten Years After Arkansas Adopted Daubert: Anything New Under the Sun?
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2012, v. 65, n. 2, p. 409
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
A DAUBERT ANALYSIS OF ABUSIVE HEAD TRAUMA/SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME.
- Published in:
- Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy, 2011, v. 11, p. 505
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article