Works matching DE "MASS torts"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 4, p. 547
- Article
2
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 111, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
3
- Review of Litigation, 2018, v. 37, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
4
- Review of Litigation, 2013, v. 3.2, n. 2, p. 299
- Article
5
- Review of Litigation, 2012, v. 31, n. 4, p. 833
- Article
6
- Review of Litigation, 2012, v. 31, n. 4, p. 747
- Article
7
- Review of Litigation, 2012, v. 31, n. 3, p. 617
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 329
- Article
9
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1339
- Article
11
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 3, p. 987
- DICKER, LISA K.;
- HEBEL, SHANE K.
- Article
12
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
13
- Florida Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 9, p. 16
- Article
14
- Florida Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 2, p. 36
- McCoy, Mac R.;
- Allen, D. Matthew;
- Kirkwood, Allison L.
- Article
16
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 439
- Article
17
- New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1273
- BURCH, ELIZABETH CHAMBLEE
- Article
18
- New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 4, p. 960
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 834
- Article
20
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2013, v. 61, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2012.0017
- KALAJDZIC, JASMINKA;
- CASHMAN, PETER;
- LONGMOORE, ALANA
- Article
21
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2011, v. 66, n. 4, p. 86
- Article
22
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2011, v. 66, n. 4, p. 85
- Article
23
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2024, v. 77, n. 3, p. 723
- Article
24
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1059
- Article
25
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2023, v. 56, n. 3, p. 613, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.56.3.short
- Article
26
- Cornell Law Review, 2011, v. 97, n. 1, p. 87
- Simard, Linda Sandstrom;
- Tidmarsh, Jay
- Article
27
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2012, v. 45, n. 4, p. 499
- Article
28
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2012, v. 45, n. 4, p. 473
- Article
29
- Merkourios, 2013, v. 29, n. 76, p. 65
- Article
30
- Pace Law Review, 2017, v. 37, n. 2, p. 617, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1948
- Article
31
- Ottawa Law Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 233
- Article
32
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 5, p. 2301
- Article
33
- Texas Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 7, p. 1773
- Article
34
- Texas Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 7, p. 1745
- Article
35
- Texas Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 7, p. 1569
- Article
36
- Texas Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 7, p. 1165
- Article
37
- Texas Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
38
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1544
- Article
39
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 3, p. 1151
- Article
40
- Yale Law Journal, 2019, v. 129, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
41
- Liverpool Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1007/s10991-019-09235-x
- Article
42
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 1259
- Article
43
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 4, p. 739
- Article
44
- Temple Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 1, p. 193
- Article
45
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
46
- DePaul Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 2, p. 641
- Article
47
- DePaul Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 2, p. 601
- Article
48
- DePaul Law Review, 2011, v. 60, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
49
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2013, v. 61, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
50
- Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 2013, v. 44, n. 3, p. 267
- Article