ANOTHER TWEAK TO MIRANDA: THE SUPREME COURT SIGNIFICANTLY LIMITS THE EDWARDS PRESUMPTION OF INVOLUNTARINESS IN CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION.
- Published in:
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 593
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "MARYLAND v. Shatzer (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 7
1
2
THE POLICE-PROSECUTOR RELATIONSHIP AND THE NO-CONTACT RULE: CONFLICTING INCENTIVES AFTER MONTEJO V. LOUISIANA AND MARYLAND V. SHATZER.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 747
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE POLICE-PROSECUTOR RELATIONSHIP AND THE NO-CONTACT RULE: CONFLICTING INCENTIVES AFTER MONTEJO V. LOUISIANA AND MARYLAND V. SHATZER.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 4, p. 747
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The US Supreme Court revisits Miranda in a trilogy of cases and clarifies some of its principles but does not weaken Miranda 's core values.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2012, v. 25, n. 3, p. 229, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2012.705526
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Supreme Court revisits (and weakens) Miranda yet again: a critical examination of the 2009 term cases.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2012, v. 25, n. 3, p. 219, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2012.705523
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Miranda, Secret Questioning, and the Right to Counsel.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2013, v. 66, n. 4, p. 931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
WHAT DOES EDWARDS BAN?: INTERROGATING, BADGERING, OR INITIATING CONTACT?
- Published in:
- Northern Kentucky Law Review, 2016, v. 43, n. 3, p. 359
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article