IDENTIFYING THE CULPRIT IN WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Law Review, 2015, v. 82, n. 4, p. 975
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "MANSON v. Brathwaite (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 8
1
2
A CALL FOR PRECEDENTIAL HEADS: WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE IS ANACHRONISTIC AND OUT-OF-STEP WITH THE EMPIRICAL REALITY.
- Published in:
- Law & Psychology Review, 2007, v. 31, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
FRESH EYES: YOUNG V. STATE'S NEW EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION TEST AND PROSPECTS FOR ALASKA AND BEYOND.
- Published in:
- Alaska Law Review, 2018, v. 35, n. 1, p. 41
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
STATE v. HENDERSON: A MODEL FOR ADMITTING EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION TESTIMONY.
- Published in:
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2013, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1256
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
REVISITING THE MANSON TEST: SOCIAL SCIENCE AS A SOURCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 3, p. 861
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
IRREPARABLE MISIDENTIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY: REASSESSING THE THRESHOLD FOR ADMISSIBILITY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
SEEING IS BELIEVING: FIGHTING EYEWITNESS MISIDENTIFICATION IN KANSAS.
- Published in:
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 27, n. 2, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
WHY AND HOW NEW YORK SHOULD ENACT MANDATORY STATEWIDE EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 3, p. 1525
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article