Works matching DE "MANDATORY minimum sentences"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
2
- Review of Litigation, 2013, v. 3.2, n. 2, p. 279
- DeGabrielle, Don J.;
- Turner, Eliot F.
- Article
3
- Estudios de Derecho, 2021, v. 78, n. 171, p. 172, doi. 10.17533/udea.esde.v78n171a07
- Article
4
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 3, p. 5622
- Article
5
- Law & Society Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1111/lasr.12001
- Article
7
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 159
- Article
8
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
9
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
10
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
11
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
12
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 421
- Article
13
- Southern California Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1079
- Article
14
- Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2022, v. 67, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1177/07067437211019656
- Fischer, Benedikt;
- Boyd, Neil;
- Brochu, Serge
- Article
15
- Villanova Law Review, 2009, v. 54, n. 5, p. 753
- Article
16
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
17
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 469
- Article
18
- Appeal: Review of Current Law & Law Reform, 2018, v. 23, p. 89
- Article
19
- Punishment & Society, 2016, v. 18, n. 1, p. 47, doi. 10.1177/1462474515623104
- Article
20
- Ottawa Law Review, 2024, v. 55, n. 2, p. 331
- Article
21
- Ottawa Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
22
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 189
- Article
23
- Cardozo Law Review, 2010, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1
- Luna, Erik;
- Cassell, Paul G.
- Article
24
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 4, p. 22
- Article
25
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2012, v. 9, n. 4, p. 729, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01266.x
- Fischman, Joshua B.;
- Schanzenbach, Max M.
- Article
26
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2016, v. 8, n. 2, p. 235
- Article
28
- Alternative Law Journal, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 50, doi. 10.1177/1037969X1403900113
- Article
29
- Alternative Law Journal, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 278
- GALLOWAY, KATE;
- ARDILL, ALLAN
- Article
30
- Alternative Law Journal, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 276
- Article
31
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 285
- Article
32
- Western Criminology Review, 2007, v. 8, n. 2, p. 44
- Article
33
- Temple Law Review, 2015, v. 87, n. 3, p. 645
- Article
34
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215
- Frumin Eisenberg, Rachael
- Article
35
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 313
- Article
36
- Mercer Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 1, p. 37
- Article
37
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2021, v. 44, n. 5, p. 149
- Article
38
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2021, v. 44, n. 5, p. 124
- Article
39
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 497
- Article
41
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 289
- Article
42
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 73
- Article
43
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
44
- Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, 2015, v. 7, p. 1
- Article
45
- Criminology, 2008, v. 46, n. 3, p. 737, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x
- Johnson, Brian D.;
- ULMER, JEFFERY T.;
- KRAMER, JOHN H.
- Article
46
- Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 114, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
47
- Sydney Law Review, 2023, v. 45, n. 3, p. 411
- Article
48
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 97
- Article
49
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
50
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 58, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.1.58
- SADY, STEPHEN R.;
- SCHROFF, GILLIAN R.
- Article