Works matching DE "MALICIOUS prosecution"
1
- Jewish Social Studies, 1975, v. 37, n. 2, p. 99
- Article
2
- Legal Studies, 2022, v. 42, n. 3, p. 470, doi. 10.1017/lst.2021.60
- Article
3
- Legal Studies, 2011, v. 31, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00176.x
- Article
4
- Legal Studies, 2006, v. 26, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00017.x
- Article
5
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 42, n. 4, p. 643
- Article
6
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 42, n. 4, p. 595
- Article
7
- Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 2014, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
8
- Vniversitas, 2013, n. 127, p. 127, doi. 10.1144/Javeriana.VJ127.dccc
- Antonio García, Pedro;
- Acevedo Prada, Milena
- Article
9
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2004, v. 49, n. 12, p. 66
- Article
10
- Journal of Iberian & Latin American Research, 2013, v. 19, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1080/13260219.2013.805722
- Article
11
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2013, v. 16, n. 1, p. 241, doi. 10.4314/pelj.v16i1.8
- Article
12
- Ottawa Law Review, 2013, v. 45, n. 1, p. 59
- McLELLAN, MYLES FREDERICK
- Article
13
- California Western Law Review, 2009, v. 45, n. 2, p. 405
- Chinn, Jeffrey;
- Ratliff, Ashley
- Article
14
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2012, v. 76, n. 5, p. 377, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2012.76.5.377
- Article
15
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2012, v. 76, n. 5, p. 369, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2012.76.5.791
- Article
16
- Critical Criminology, 2011, v. 19, n. 3, p. 175, doi. 10.1007/s10612-010-9111-y
- Article
17
- Sensors (14248220), 2015, v. 15, n. 5, p. 10631, doi. 10.3390/s150510631
- Chunyu Miao;
- Guoyong Dai;
- Kezhen Ying;
- Qingzhang Chen
- Article
18
- Police Journal, 2010, v. 83, n. 2, p. 181, doi. 10.1350/pojo.2010.83.2.520
- Wicks, David;
- Carney, Damian
- Article
20
- Law & Philosophy, 1983, v. 2, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.1007/BF00144449
- Article
21
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2018, v. 83, n. 3, p. 807
- Article
22
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2015, v. 34, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
23
- Columbia Law Review, 2006, v. 106, n. 3, p. 643
- Article
24
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2011, v. 50, n. 7, p. 411, doi. 10.1080/10509674.2011.603033
- Wildeman, Jennifer;
- Costelloe, Michael;
- Schehr, Robert
- Article
25
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2015, v. 46, n. 3, p. 407
- ORR, CYNTHIA E. HUJAR;
- RODERY, ROBERT G.
- Article
26
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 3, p. 775
- Article
27
- Journal of Law & Education, 2019, v. 48, n. 3, p. 383
- Article
28
- Indiana Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 2, p. 391, doi. 10.18060/27226
- Article
29
- Journal of Environmental Health, 2003, v. 65, n. 6, p. 36
- Article
30
- Journal of Environmental Health, 2002, v. 65, n. 1, p. 38
- Article
31
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2006, v. 33, n. 2, p. 191
- Article
32
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, v. 110, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
33
- McGill Law Journal, 2024, v. 69, n. 2, p. 141, doi. 10.26443/law.v69i2.1526
- Article
34
- Emory International Law Review, 2005, v. 19, n. 3, p. 1615
- Article
35
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2023, v. 47, n. 2, p. 221
- Article
36
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2017, v. 84, n. 2, p. 11
- Boettjer, Shannon E.;
- Newman, Thomas R.
- Article
37
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2024, v. 80, n. 6, p. 230
- Article
38
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2016, v. 72, n. 6, p. 296
- Article
39
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2015, v. 71, n. 5, p. 232
- Article
40
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2019, v. 46, n. 4, p. 876
- Article
41
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2005, v. 9, n. 3, p. 158, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2005.9.3.158
- Article
42
- Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.32604/csse.2021.015074
- Zhengqiu Weng;
- Timing Chen;
- Tiantian Zhu;
- Hang Dong;
- Dan Zhou;
- Alfarraj, Osama
- Article
43
- Virginia Law Review, 2024, v. 110, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
44
- Virginia Law Review, 2013, v. 99, n. 7, p. 1635
- Article
45
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2014, v. 40, n. 1, p. 135
- Article