STANDING UNCERTAINTY: AN EXPECTED-VALUE STANDARD FOR FEAR-BASED INJURY IN CLAPPER V. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 5, p. 711
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "LOCUS standi (Constitutional law)"
Results: 38
1
2
Standing for (and up to) Separation of Powers.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2016, v. 91, n. 3, p. 665
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
ENFORCING VICTIMS' RIGHTS IN ILLINOIS: THE RATIONALE FOR VICTIM "STANDING" IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 597
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Legislative Power, Executive Duty, and Legislative Lawsuits.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 31, n. 2, p. 103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE -- INFORMER LACKS STANDING TO BRING COMPLAINT UNDER § 962 OF THE NEUTRALITY ACT -- Bauer v. Marmara, 774 F.3d 1026 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
- Published in:
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 537
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
IN RE SUPERVALU, INC.: AN ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE III STANDING AND THE CIRCUIT SPLIT IN DATA BREACH CASES.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 1, p. 97
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Severability, Remedies, and Constitutional Adjudication.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 83, n. 1, p. 56
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Undemocratic Restraint.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 845
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
The Sins of Innocence in Standing Doctrine.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 297
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
LIFE IS SHORT. GO TO COURT: ESTABLISHING ARTICLE III STANDING IN DATA BREACH CASES.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 3, p. 683
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
MAKING SENSE OF LEGISLATIVE STANDING.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
A PLACE TO STAND TO MOVE THE EARTH: STANDING AND THE RULE OF LAW.
- Published in:
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, p. 367
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
The Fragmentation of Standing.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
SO YOU'VE BEEN NOTIFIED, NOW WHAT? THE PROBLEM WITH CURRENT DATA-BREACH NOTIFICATION LAWS.
- Published in:
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1171
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
"AMORPHOUS FEDERALISM" AND THE SUPREME COURT'S MARRIAGE CASES.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 393
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Posner's Pragmatic Justiciability Jurisprudence: The Triumph of Possibility over Probability.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, p. 1117
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
PROSPECTIVE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND CLASS SETTLEMENTS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 769
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
A "[NON]ESSENTIAL LIMIT ON OUR POWER": STANDING DOCTRINE AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN HOLLINGSWORTH V. PERRY, 133 S. CT. 2652 (2013).
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL VETO.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 114, n. 7, p. 1783
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CHINA AND THE ISSUE OF LOCUS STANDI IN CRIMINAL DEFENSE.
- Published in:
- Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution, 2015, v. 23, n. 1, p. 93
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
FROM RIPE TO ROTTEN: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONTINUED UTILITY OF THE RIPENESS DOCTRINE IN LIGHT OF THE MODERN STANDING DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 625
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
ZONE-OF-INTERESTS STANDING IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES AFTER LEXMARK.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2017, v. 21, n. 1, p. 97
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
CLAPPER v. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: ALLOWING THE FISA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008 TO TURN "INCIDENTALLY INTO "CERTAINLY".
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 3, p. 1018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
SUPPLEMENTAL STANDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
- Published in:
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, v. 109, n. 2, p. 285
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
SYMBOLISM AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT: THE INJURY OF EXPOSURE TO GOVERNMENTALLY ENDORSED SYMBOLS OF RACIAL SUPERIORITY.
- Published in:
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2019, v. 25, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.25.1.thirteenth
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Affordable Care Act Litigation: The Standing Paradox.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2012, v. 38, n. 2/3, p. 410, doi. 10.1177/009885881203800207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Civil Procedure. Watson v. Fox, 44 A.3d 130 (R.I. 2012).
- Published in:
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2013, v. 18, n. 2, p. 292
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
The Future of Taxpayer Standing in Establishment Clause Tax Credit Cases.
- Published in:
- Oregon Law Review, 2013, v. 92, n. 2, p. 263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
THE ROLE OF RIVAL LITIGATION IN WILMARTH'S NEW GLASS-STEAGALL.
- Published in:
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2022, v. 93, n. 4, p. 961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
WON'T YOU BE MY NEIGHBOR? THE FALLOUT FROM THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN COGCC V. GVCA.
- Published in:
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2014, v. 85, n. 3, p. 901
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Behind Closed Doors: An Argument for State Constitutional Standing to Challenge Public-Private Development Corporations.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
32
States' Stances on Public Interest Standing.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2015, v. 76, n. 3, p. 729
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
DOES UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR (THE DOMA CASE) OPEN THE DOOR TO CONGRESSIONAL STANDING RIGHTS?
- Published in:
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2014, v. 76, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2014.318
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
INTERVENTION.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2020, v. 106, n. 2, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
(UN)LIMITING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW: WIND RIVER, SECTION 2401(A), AND THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE FEDERAL AGENCIES.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 1, p. 157
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF ABUSED PRIVACY RIGHTS: MODIFYING THIRD-PARTY FOURTH AMENDMENT STANDING DOCTRINE POST-SPOKEO.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2017, v. 66, n. 3, p. 971
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
WHO'S STANDING IN THE DISTRICT AFTER GRAYSON V. AT&T CORP.? THE APPLICABILITY OF THE CASE-OR-CONTROVERSY REQUIREMENT IN D.C. COURTS.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 62, n. 3, p. 739
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Standing at a Constitutional Divide: Redefining State and Federal Requirements for Initiatives After Hollingsworth v. Perry.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 1, p. 229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article