Works matching DE "LOCUS standi"
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
2
- Widener Law Journal, 2005, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1021
- Article
3
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 3, p. 1517
- Article
4
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 476
- Article
6
- Natural Resources Journal, 2002, v. 42, n. 2, p. 415
- Article
8
- Duke Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 7, p. 1493
- Article
9
- Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
10
- Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- Columbia Law Review, 2013, v. 113, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
12
- Banking Law Journal, 2014, v. 131, n. 6, p. 444
- Article
13
- Banking Law Journal, 2013, v. 130, n. 10, p. 951
- Article
14
- Banking Law Journal, 2013, v. 130, n. 6, p. 491
- WHITE, JASON;
- FRANK, JOSEPH;
- KAHN, DANIEL;
- DICKSON, ADAM
- Article
15
- International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 62, doi. 10.1093/lawfam/ebr022
- Harder, Lois;
- Thomarat, Michelle
- Article
16
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2012, v. 45, p. 15
- Hakstian, Anne-Marie;
- Sergeant, Craig
- Article
17
- Emory Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
18
- Novi Sad Faculty of Law: Collected Papers / Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu, 2011, v. 45, n. 1, p. 605, doi. 10.5937/zrpfns1101605C
- Article
19
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 717
- Chertok, Mark A.;
- Mach, Daniel
- Article
20
- Nevada Law Journal, 2015, v. 15, n. 3., p. 1181
- Article
21
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 1, p. 291
- Article
22
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1183
- Article
23
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 3, p. 603
- Article
24
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 369
- Article
25
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1203
- Article
26
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 7, p. 1283
- Article
27
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 628
- Article
28
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 498
- Article
29
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 628
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 498
- Article
31
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 834
- Article
32
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2012, v. 15, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2012.00439.x
- Jiang, Fuxiao;
- Gervais, Daniel
- Article
33
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2007, v. 7, n. 2, p. 215, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2007.11421483
- Article
34
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 1064, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1867
- Article
35
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 631, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1859
- Article
36
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2012, v. 27, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
37
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 461
- Article
38
- Florida Bar Journal, 2021, v. 95, n. 2, p. 8
- Article
39
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 9, p. 64
- Article
40
- 2016
- ELLROD, MATTHEW D.;
- ROSEN, EVAN M.
- Letter to the Editor
41
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 7, p. 42
- Article
42
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 7, p. 70
- Article
43
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 45
- Article
44
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 3, p. 20
- Hunter Jr., Gary K.;
- Murphy, Julie M.
- Article
45
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 597
- Article
46
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 2, p. 411
- Article
47
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2013, v. 43, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
48
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2022, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1033
- Article
49
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 743
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1071
- Article