In Mitigation of the Penalty of Death: Lockett v. Ohio and the Capital Defendant's Right to Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances.Published in:California Law Review, 1981, v. 69, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.2307/3480122By:Hertz, Randy;Weisberg, RobertPublication type:Article
TRYING TO GET IT RIGHT--OHIO, FROM THE EIGHTIES TO THE TEENS.Published in:Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 783By:Koosed, Margery M.Publication type:Article
THE TRUE LEGACY OF ATKINS AND ROPER: THE UNRELIABILITY PRINCIPLE, MENTALLY ILL DEFENDANTS, AND THE DEATH PENALTY'S UNRAVELING.Published in:William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 487By:Sundby, Scott E.Publication type:Article
THE LIMITS OF LAW IN THE EVALUATION OF MITIGATING EVIDENCE.Published in:American Journal of Criminal Law, 2018, v. 45, n. 1, p. 167By:Atiq, Emad H.;Miller, Erin L.Publication type:Article