Works matching DE "LOCHNER v. People of the State of New York"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 7, p. 2478
- Article
2
- Villanova Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 3, p. 443
- Article
3
- University of Miami Law Review, 2017, v. 71, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
4
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 210
- Article
5
- Urban Lawyer, 2016, v. 48, n. 4, p. 939
- Article
6
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 6, p. 1453
- Article
8
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2019, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1099
- Article
9
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 5, p. 1039
- Article
10
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 5, p. 913
- Article
11
- Law & History Review, 2018, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1021, doi. 10.1017/S0738248018000421
- Article
12
- Law & History Review, 2013, v. 31, n. 2, p. 275, doi. 10.1017/S0738248013000047
- Article
13
- Michigan Law Review, 1998, v. 97, n. 2, p. 462, doi. 10.2307/1290291
- Article
14
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2014, v. 77, n. 4, p. 195
- Article
15
- History of Political Economy, 2017, v. 49, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1215/00182702-3777146
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 2, p. 335, doi. 10.15779/Z38Z31NN40
- Bambauer, Jane R.;
- Bambauer, Derek E.
- Article
17
- California Law Review, 2009, v. 97, n. 3, p. 751
- Article
18
- Pace Law Review, 2018, v. 38, n. 2, p. 384, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1967
- Article
20
- Constitutional Commentary, 2019, v. 34, n. 2, p. 263
- Roosevelt III, Kermit;
- Khan, Heath
- Article
21
- Constitutional Commentary, 2000, v. 17, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
22
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
24
- UCLA Law Review, 2017, v. 64, n. 4, p. 844
- Article
25
- Minnesota Law Review, 2021, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1667
- Article
26
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 1, p. 411
- Article
27
- William & Mary Law Review, 1999, v. 41, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
28
- William & Mary Law Review, 1999, v. 41, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
29
- Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 2013, v. 93, n. 3, p. 18
- Article
30
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0024
- Article
32
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2011, v. 36, n. 2, p. 116, doi. 10.1353/sch.2011.0013
- Article
33
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2000, v. 25, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.1111/1059-4329.00006
- Article
34
- Boston University Law Review, 2020, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1377
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 3, p. 697
- Article
37
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2013, v. 17, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
38
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 5, p. 1663
- Article
39
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009, v. 62, n. 2, p. 591
- Article
40
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009, v. 62, n. 2, p. 567
- Article
41
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 101
- Article
42
- Campbell Law Review, 2021, v. 43, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
43
- Campbell Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
44
- Virginia Law Review, 2019, v. 105, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
45
- Virginia Law Review, 2008, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1509
- Article
46
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 2, p. 589
- Article
47
- Marquette Law Review, 2012, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1253
- Article
48
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2013, v. 39, n. 2/3, p. 298, doi. 10.1177/009885881303900206
- Mermin, Seth E.;
- Graff, Samantha K.
- Article
49
- Southern Law Journal, 2021, v. 30, p. 57
- LOWENSTEIN, HENRY;
- SULLIVAN, LAURA L.
- Article
50
- American Journal of Legal History, 2020, v. 60, n. 3, p. 253, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njaa014
- Article