Works matching DE "LIQUIDATED damages"
1
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 23, n. 3, p. 395, doi. 10.3366/elr.2019.0575
- Davie QC, Michael;
- Dowers, Neil
- Article
2
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2015, v. 19, n. 1, p. 119, doi. 10.3366/elr.2015.0255
- Article
3
- University of Miami Law Review, 2016, v. 70, n. 3, p. 998
- Article
4
- California Law Review, 1974, v. 62, n. 2, p. 465
- Article
5
- California Law Review, 1960, v. 48, n. 5, p. 729, doi. 10.2307/3478351
- Article
6
- Arbitration Journal, 1992, v. 47, n. 3, p. 71
- Article
7
- Arbitration Journal, 1989, v. 44, n. 4, p. 65
- Article
8
- Arbitration Journal, 1984, v. 39, n. 2, p. 77
- Article
9
- Arbitration Journal, 1974, v. 29, n. 4, p. 278
- Article
10
- Arbitration Journal, 1972, v. 27, n. 3, p. 198
- Article
11
- Arbitration Journal, 1971, v. 26, n. 1, p. 58
- Article
12
- Arbitration Journal, 1966, v. 21, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
13
- Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 2016, v. 25, n. 2, p. 343
- Article
14
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1317
- Remus, Dana A.;
- Zimmerman, Adam S.
- Article
15
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 293
- Article
16
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 293
- Article
17
- Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 795
- Article
18
- Nevada Law Journal, 2018, v. 19, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
19
- Nevada Law Journal, 2011, v. 12, n. 1, p. 112
- Article
20
- Southern California Law Review, 2021, v. 94, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
21
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2019, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1149
- Article
22
- Deakin Law Review, 2013, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.21153/dlr2013vol18no1art55
- Article
23
- Real Estate Economics, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 204, doi. 10.1111/1540-6229.12142
- Article
24
- Liverpool Law Review, 2022, v. 43, n. 2, p. 451, doi. 10.1007/s10991-022-09309-3
- Teng, Joshua;
- Kalaiarasu, Kailash
- Article
25
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, 2013, v. 20, p. 107
- Article
26
- Value Examiner, 2008, p. 5
- Article
27
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 993
- Article
28
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2009, v. 20, n. 3, p. 485, doi. 10.1080/10345329.2009.12035826
- Article
29
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2013, n. 5, p. 59
- Article
30
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
31
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2013, v. 10, n. 3, p. 512, doi. 10.1111/jels.12018
- Feldman, Yuval;
- Schurr, Amos;
- Teichman, Doron
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 1921, v. 10, n. 1, p. 8, doi. 10.2307/3473888
- Article
33
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1001
- Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess;
- Hoffman, David A.
- Article
34
- Te Mata Koi: Auckland University Law Review, 2017, v. 23, p. 147
- Article
35
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2022, v. 75, n. 2, p. 251
- Article
36
- Contract Management, 2021, v. 61, n. 10, p. 56
- Article
37
- Contract Management, 2015, v. 55, n. 5, p. 66
- HORAN, JACK;
- NANDIVADA, SANDEEP
- Article
38
- Contract Management, 2013, v. 53, n. 3, p. 70
- Article
39
- 2013
- HORAN, JACK;
- JOHN, KATHERINE M.
- Opinion
40
- Contract Management, 2010, v. 50, n. 11, p. 80
- Article
41
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2020, v. 33, n. 2, p. 295
- Article
42
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
43
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 3, p. 363
- Article
44
- Gdansk Journal of East Asian Studies / Gdanskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 2017, n. 12, p. 96
- Article
45
- Business Lawyer, 2021, v. 76, n. 4, p. 1315
- Liberatore, Dominic A.;
- Whelan, Stephen T.;
- Gross, Edward K.
- Article
46
- Business Lawyer, 2009, v. 64, n. 3, p. 757
- Article
47
- NAELA Journal, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
48
- Journal of Civil Engineering & Management, 2020, v. 26, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.3846/jcem.2020.11663
- Chien-Liang LIN;
- Yu-Che LAI
- Article
49
- Monthly Labor Review, 1995, v. 118, n. 10, p. 48
- Article
50
- Franchise Law Journal, 2018, v. 37, n. 4, p. 523
- Article