Works matching DE "LEGISLATIVE intent"
1
- Advocate (05154987), 2025, v. 68, n. 5, p. 34
- Article
2
- Statute Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmx030
- Article
3
- Statute Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 1, p. 40, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmy031
- Article
4
- Statute Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmy025
- Article
6
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2019, v. 64, n. 4, p. 479, doi. 10.1177/0003603X19875036
- Article
7
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2017, v. 40, n. 3, p. 952, doi. 10.53637/mhzw7665
- DUFFY, JAMES;
- O'BRIEN, JOHN
- Article
8
- Kansas Law Review, 2023, v. 71, n. 5, p. 773
- Article
9
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2012, v. 44, n. 2, p. 30
- Article
10
- Environmental Law (Lewis & Clark Law School), 2024, v. 54, n. 3, p. 675
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 2, p. 467
- Article
12
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2015, v. 45, n. 1, p. 175, doi. 10.1111/psq.12184
- Article
13
- Legal Theory, 2013, v. 19, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1017/S135232521300013X
- Article
14
- Classical Russia / Imperskaia Rossiia 1700-1825, 2008, v. 3-5, p. 201
- Article
15
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
16
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2018, v. 33, n. 4, p. 889, doi. 10.15779/Z385H7BT71
- Article
17
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 3, p. 741
- Article
18
- Ratio Juris, 2011, v. 24, n. 4, p. 435, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00494.x
- Article
19
- Parliamentarian, 2023, v. 104, n. 4, p. 294
- Article
20
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1143
- Article
21
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 1143
- Article
22
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2024, v. 44, n. 2, p. 231, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqae001
- Collins, Stephanie;
- Tan, David
- Article
24
- Southern Law Journal, 2012, v. 22, n. 1, p. 37
- Cavaliere, Frank J.;
- Mulvaney, Toni P.;
- Swerdlow, Marleen R.
- Article
25
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 5, p. 1622
- Article
26
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 336
- Article
27
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 336
- Article
28
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 2, p. 675
- Article
29
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2020, v. 77, n. 4, p. 33
- KONAR-STEENBERG, MEHMET K.
- Article
30
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, v. 8, p. 239, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01228.x
- Article
31
- International Tax Journal, 2024, v. 50, n. 1, p. 7
- Poms, Douglas;
- de Ruig, David;
- Madaj, Elena
- Article
32
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 5, p. 1119
- Article
33
- International Journal of Business & Public Administration, 2014, v. 11, n. 1, p. 149
- Houser, Kimberly A.;
- Rosacker, Robert E.
- Article
34
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 101
- Article
35
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 477
- Article
36
- Hofstra Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 1, p. 331
- Article
37
- Hofstra Law Review, 2016, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1287
- Article
38
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2021, v. 48, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.15779/Z38X05XD4C
- Grillo Avila, Rafael Alberto
- Article
39
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2014, v. 18, n. 1, p. 170, doi. 10.3366/elr.2014.0200
- Article
40
- Law & Philosophy, 2024, v. 43, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1007/s10982-023-09481-1
- Article
41
- Law & Philosophy, 2017, v. 36, n. 6, p. 651, doi. 10.1007/s10982-017-9302-8
- Article
42
- Law & Philosophy, 2013, v. 32, n. 6, p. 729, doi. 10.1007/s10982-012-9166-x
- Article
43
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 2, p. 925
- Article
45
- Canadian Parliamentary Review, 2017, v. 40, n. 1, p. 6
- Article
46
- Canadian Parliamentary Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 15
- Barker, Susan;
- Anderson, Erica
- Article
48
- Boston College Law Review, 2022, v. 63, p. II-46
- Article
49
- Boston College Law Review, 2019, v. 60, p. 17
- Article
50
- Boston College Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 5, p. 1613
- Article