Works matching DE "LEGAL status of plaintiffs"
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
2
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
3
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 4, p. 625
- Article
4
- Columbia Law Review, 2017, v. 117, n. 7, p. 1897
- Article
5
- American Law & Economics Review, 2016, v. 18, n. 2, p. 272, doi. 10.1093/aler/ahw010
- Rampa, Giorgio;
- Saraceno, Margherita
- Article
6
- American Law & Economics Review, 2016, v. 18, n. 1, p. 122, doi. 10.1093/aler/ahv017
- Krishnan, C. N. V.;
- Davidoff Solomon, Steven;
- Thomas, Randall S.
- Article
7
- Law & Justice Review, 2018, v. 9, n. 16, p. 183
- Article
8
- FIU Law Review, 2020, v. 14, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.14.1.10
- Article
9
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 66, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1217
- Article
11
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 869
- Article
12
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
13
- 2014
- Evangelis, Theane;
- Hamburger, Bradley J.
- Essay
14
- Australian International Law Journal, 2011, v. 18, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
15
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1367
- Article
16
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2016.6
- Sangiuliano, Anthony Robert
- Article
17
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 3, p. 683
- Article
18
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 2, p. 241
- KLERMAN, DANIEL;
- REILLY, GREG
- Article
19
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 6, p. 1155
- Article
20
- Deakin Law Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 199, doi. 10.21153/dlr2014vol19no2art342
- Article
21
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 115, n. 5, p. 639, doi. 10.36644/mlr.115.5.retaliatory
- Article
22
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 5, p. 711
- Article
23
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
24
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 83, n. 1, p. 273
- Article
25
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 834
- Article
26
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 890
- Article
27
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
28
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
29
- California Law Review, 2016, v. 104, n. 2, p. 545, doi. 10.15779/Z38VK2X
- Article
30
- Pace Law Review, 2015, v. 36, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1912
- Article
31
- Ottawa Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 3, p. 495
- Article
32
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2020, v. 57, n. 2, p. 295
- Article
33
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 7, p. 42
- Article
34
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 2, p. 16
- Schackow, Gerald D.;
- Schackow, Brian G.
- Article
35
- Judicature, 2017, v. 101, n. 3, p. 75
- Article
36
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
37
- Fiat Iustitia, 2016, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
38
- CoatingsTech, 2016, v. 13, n. 6, p. 24
- Article
39
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2014, v. 69, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
40
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, v. 109, n. 2, p. 475
- Article
41
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, v. 109, n. 2, p. 285
- Article
42
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, v. 108, n. 4, p. 1301
- Article
43
- Journal of Legal Economics, 2018, v. 24, n. 1/2, p. 37
- Bruce, Christopher;
- Aldridge, Derek
- Article
44
- Kansas Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
45
- Kansas Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
46
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2291
- Article
47
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 102, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
48
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 4, p. 1535
- Article
49
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 4, p. 1323
- Korsmo, Charles R.;
- Myers, Minor
- Article
50
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 3, p. 1113
- Article