Works matching DE "LEGAL status of plaintiffs"
1
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
2
- Deakin Law Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 199, doi. 10.21153/dlr2014vol19no2art342
- Article
3
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 115, n. 5, p. 639, doi. 10.36644/mlr.115.5.retaliatory
- Article
4
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 5, p. 711
- Article
5
- CoatingsTech, 2016, v. 13, n. 6, p. 24
- Article
6
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 66, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
7
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1217
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 869
- Article
9
- 2014
- Evangelis, Theane;
- Hamburger, Bradley J.
- Essay
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
11
- Kansas Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
12
- Kansas Law Review, 2018, v. 67, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
13
- Environmental Law (Lewis & Clark Law School), 2015, v. 45, n. 4, p. 849
- Article
14
- Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 155
- Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett;
- Jones, RonNell Andersen
- Article
15
- William & Mary Law Review, 2010, v. 51, n. 6, p. 1997
- Article
16
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
17
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
18
- Fiat Iustitia, 2016, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
19
- California Law Review, 2016, v. 104, n. 2, p. 545, doi. 10.15779/Z38VK2X
- Article
20
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 7, p. 42
- Article
21
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 2, p. 16
- Schackow, Gerald D.;
- Schackow, Brian G.
- Article
22
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
23
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1057
- Green, Michael D.;
- Sanders, Joseph
- Article
24
- Cornell Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1597
- Article
25
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
26
- 2014
- Eisenberg, Theodore;
- Clermont, Kevin M.
- Essay
27
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
28
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
29
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 83, n. 1, p. 273
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 890
- Article
31
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 834
- Article
32
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2014, v. 69, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
33
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2023, v. 14, n. 3, p. 152, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpad015
- Kozak, Malgorzata;
- Mainardi, Jacek
- Article
34
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2023, v. 14, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpac050
- Breuvart, Charlotte;
- Laconte, Philippe
- Article
35
- FIU Law Review, 2020, v. 14, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.14.1.10
- Article
36
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 2, p. 569
- Article
37
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2018, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1227
- Article
38
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 67
- Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee
- Article
39
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1353
- Article
40
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 565
- Article
41
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
42
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 3, p. 683
- Article
43
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 2, p. 241
- KLERMAN, DANIEL;
- REILLY, GREG
- Article
44
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2021, v. 56, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
45
- San Diego Law Review, 2021, v. 58, n. 3, p. 641
- Article
46
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
47
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 4, p. 625
- Article
48
- Jus et Civitas, 2015, v. II (LXVI), n. 2, p. 65
- Article
49
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 462
- O'Shea, Timothy M.;
- Stroebel, Sarah B.;
- Banker, Paul A.;
- Birnbaum, Robert
- Article
50
- Pace Law Review, 2015, v. 36, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1912
- Article