Works matching DE "LEGAL status of midwives"
1
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2020, v. 40, n. 2, p. 245
- Article
2
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2015, v. 23, n. 9, p. 614, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2015.23.9.614
- Article
3
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2015, v. 23, n. 8, p. 580, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2015.23.8.580
- Article
4
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2015, v. 23, n. 7, p. 527, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2015.23.7.527
- Article
5
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2015, v. 23, n. 6, p. 450, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2015.23.6.450
- Article
6
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2014, v. 22, n. 11, p. 822, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2014.22.11.822
- Article
7
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2014, v. 22, n. 10, p. 752, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2014.22.10.752
- Article
9
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2013, v. 21, n. 12, p. 905, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.12.905
- Article
10
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2013, v. 21, n. 10, p. 753, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.10.753
- Article
11
- 2013
- Thompson, Erika;
- Lewis, Paul
- Opinion
12
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2013, v. 21, n. 9, p. 676, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.9.676
- Article
13
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2013, v. 21, n. 6, p. 449, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.449
- Article
14
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2013, v. 21, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.3.221
- Article
15
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 12, p. 905, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.12.905
- Article
17
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 10, p. 753, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.10.753
- Article
18
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 601, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.601
- Article
19
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 7, p. 525, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.7.525
- Article
20
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 4, p. 296, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.4.296
- Article
21
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 8, p. 536, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.8.536
- Article
22
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 7, p. 414
- Article
23
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 5, p. 327, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.5.327
- Article
24
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 3, p. 193, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.3.193
- Article
25
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 2, p. 123, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.2.123
- Article
26
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 1, p. 44, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.1.44
- Article
27
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2010, v. 18, n. 7, p. 449, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2010.18.7.48786
- Article
28
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2010, v. 18, n. 7, p. 429, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2010.18.7.48782
- Article
29
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2010, v. 18, n. 4, p. 262, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2010.18.4.47381
- Article
30
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2009, v. 17, n. 5, p. 324, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2009.17.5.42230
- Article
31
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2009, v. 17, n. 5, p. 322, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2009.17.5.42229
- Article
32
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2008, v. 16, n. 11, p. 752, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.11.31621
- Article
33
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2008, v. 16, n. 8, p. 540, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.8.30790
- Article
34
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2008, v. 16, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.1.27934
- Article
35
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 11, p. 722, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.11.27475
- Article
36
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 10, p. 645, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.10.27349
- Article
37
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2006, v. 14, n. 12, p. 715, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2006.14.12.22510
- Article
38
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 70, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2006.14.2.20425
- Article
39
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2005, v. 13, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.1.17322
- Article
40
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2005, v. 13, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.1.17321
- Article
41
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2004, v. 12, n. 10, p. 641, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2004.12.10.16103
- Article
42
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2004, v. 12, n. 10, p. 624, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2004.12.10.16099
- Article
43
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2004, v. 12, n. 5, p. 290, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2004.12.5.12875
- Article
44
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2004, v. 12, n. 2, p. 84, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2004.12.2.12025
- Article
45
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2003, v. 11, n. 3, p. 169, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2003.11.3.12092
- Article
46
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2002, v. 10, n. 4, p. 239, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2002.10.4.10338
- Article
47
- British Journal of Healthcare Assistants, 2012, v. 6, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.12968/bjha.2012.6.1.41
- Article
48
- Temple Law Review, 2021, v. 93, n. 2, p. 243
- Article
49
- Temple Law Review, 2018, v. 91, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
50
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2008, v. 53, n. 11, p. 24
- Article