Works matching DE "LEGAL status of defendants"
1
- Computer und Recht, 2019, v. 35, n. 11, p. 753, doi. 10.9785/cr-2019-351119
- Article
2
- UMKC Law Review, 2015, v. 84, n. 2, p. 449
- Article
3
- Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 2014, v. 24, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
4
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 985
- Article
5
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1175
- Article
6
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1487
- Article
7
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1003
- Article
8
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1469
- Article
9
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1513
- Article
10
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1263
- Article
11
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1333
- Article
12
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1399
- Article
13
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1427
- Article
14
- St. John's Law Review, 2022, v. 94, n. 4, p. 961
- Article
15
- St. John's Law Review, 2021, v. 94, n. 2, p. 529
- Article
16
- San Diego Law Review, 2021, v. 58, n. 3, p. 579
- KIDD, JEREMY;
- WHITEHEAD, CHAS
- Article
17
- Denver Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 4, p. 867
- Article
18
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 699
- Article
19
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
20
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2015, v. 29, n. 2, p. 200, doi. 10.1002/acp.3094
- Nuñez, Narina;
- Schweitzer, Kimberly;
- Chai, Christopher A.;
- Myers, Bryan
- Article
21
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
22
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
23
- Southern California Law Review, 2019, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1235
- Article
24
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
25
- Legal Studies, 2021, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/lst.2020.44
- Article
26
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2018, v. 85, n. 7, p. 1589
- Article
27
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 2, p. 835
- Article
28
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
29
- Regulation, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 12
- KLICK, JONATHAN;
- MUNGAN, MURAT
- Article
30
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1902
- Article
31
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1006
- Article
32
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv016
- Article
33
- Arizona Law Review, 2015, v. 57, n. 2, p. 551
- Article
34
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1007/s10657-015-9506-z
- Grajzl, Peter;
- Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina;
- Zajc, Katarina
- Article
35
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
36
- Elder Law Journal, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 249
- Article
37
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2020, v. 25, n. 2, p. 147, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.25.2.jail
- Article
38
- Mercer Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 5, p. 1211
- Article
39
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.15779/Z38285T
- Article
40
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2021, v. 62, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
41
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1811
- Article
42
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 104, n. 1, p. 101
- Eldar, Ofer;
- Sukhatme, Neel U.
- Article
44
- Tennessee Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 1, p. 251
- Article
45
- Tennessee Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 699
- Article
46
- Minnesota Law Review, 2019, v. 103, n. 3, p. 1525
- Article
47
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 1, p. 405
- Article
48
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 124, n. 5, p. 1690
- Article
49
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 124, n. 2, p. 448
- Article
50
- European Journal of International Law, 2023, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chad035
- Manley, Stewart;
- Tehrani, Pardis Moslemzadeh;
- Rasiah, Rajah
- Article