Works matching DE "LEGAL status of defendants"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 124, n. 5, p. 1690
- Article
2
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 124, n. 2, p. 448
- Article
3
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2018, v. 85, n. 7, p. 1589
- Article
4
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 2, p. 835
- Article
5
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
6
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1902
- Article
7
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1006
- Article
8
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
9
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
10
- American Law & Economics Review, 2021, v. 23, n. 1, p. 207, doi. 10.1093/aler/ahab006
- Liu, Zhiyong (John);
- Avraham, Ronen;
- Qiao, Yue
- Article
11
- Southwestern Law Review, 2014, v. 43, n. 3, p. 431
- Article
12
- Elder Law Journal, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 249
- Article
13
- Arkansas Law Notes, 2020, v. 73, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
14
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 67, n. 1, p. 124
- Article
15
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
16
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
17
- New York Law School Law Review, 2020, v. 65, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
18
- New York Law School Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3/4, p. 395
- Article
20
- Temple Law Review, 2020, v. 92, n. 3, p. 673
- Article
21
- Syracuse Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 3, p. 491
- Article
22
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
23
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
24
- Southern California Law Review, 2019, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1235
- Article
25
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
26
- Virginia Journal of International Law, 2020, v. 61, n. 1, p. 57
- Article
27
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
28
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
29
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. 157
- Article
30
- Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 2017, v. 75, p. 139
- Article
31
- Denver Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 4, p. 867
- Article
32
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 699
- Article
33
- Universul Juridic, 2016, p. 202
- Article
34
- Computer und Recht, 2019, v. 35, n. 11, p. 753, doi. 10.9785/cr-2019-351119
- Article
35
- Translation & Interpreting Studies: The Journal of the American Translation & Interpreting Studies Association, 2015, v. 10, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.1075/tis.10.2.02mas
- Article
36
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 3, p. 387
- Article
37
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 467
- Article
38
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 1, p. 42
- Article
39
- Journal of Passthrough Entities, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 21
- Frost, Steven G.;
- Close, Jeff;
- Lombardo, Joe
- Article
40
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2018, v. 22, n. 4, p. 321, doi. 10.1177/1365712718780800
- Article
42
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
43
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 50
- Holsinger, Alexander M.;
- Lowenkamp, Christopher T.;
- Latessa, Edward J.;
- Serin, Ralph;
- Cohen, Thomas H.;
- Robinson, Charles R.;
- Flores, Anthony W.;
- VanBenschoten, Scott W.
- Article
44
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 13
- Article
45
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 3
- Article
46
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
47
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
48
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, v. 108, n. 4, p. 1301
- Article
49
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 765
- Article