Works matching DE "LEGAL status of artists"
1
- Kentucky Libraries, 2014, v. 78, n. 3, p. 10
- Article
2
- Modern Language Journal (Wiley-Blackwell), 1950, v. 34, n. 6, p. 487, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1950.tb04910.x
- Article
3
- Michigan Law Review, 2011, v. 110, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
4
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 6, p. 2003
- Article
5
- Anuario de Propiedad Intelectual, 2020, n. 2019, p. 335
- Article
6
- Anuario de Propiedad Intelectual, 2020, n. 2019, p. 319
- Article
7
- International Labour Review, 1973, v. 107, n. 4, p. 303
- Article
8
- California Law Review, 2009, v. 97, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
9
- California Law Review, 1992, v. 80, n. 2, p. 471, doi. 10.2307/3480771
- Article
10
- California Law Review, 1989, v. 77, n. 6, p. 1431, doi. 10.2307/3480684
- Article
12
- North Carolina Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 4, p. 1001
- Article
13
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 11, p. 1618
- Article
14
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2012, v. 3, n. 1, p. 55
- Moss, Aaron J.;
- Basin, Kenneth
- Article
15
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2011, v. 14, p. 385
- Article
16
- Vniversitas, 2015, n. 131, p. 391, doi. 10.11144/Javeriana.vj131.cgra
- Article
17
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 1, p. 239
- Article
18
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, v. 29, n. 1, p. 215
- Article
19
- Acta Koreana, 2009, v. 12, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.18399/acta.2009.12.1.003
- Article
20
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2013, n. 2, p. 77
- Article
21
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2015, n. 96, p. 167
- Article
22
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2012, n. 80, p. 167
- Article
23
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2010, n. 69, p. 33
- Article
24
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2010, n. 68, p. 45
- Article
25
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2008, n. 61, p. 74
- Article
26
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2015, v. 35, n. 3, p. 281
- Article
27
- Chapman Law Review, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 119
- Steiner, Christine;
- Bee-Seon Keum
- Article
28
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 122, n. 1, p. 218
- Article
29
- History Today, 1952, v. 2, n. 8, p. 544
- Article
30
- Temple Law Review, 2011, v. 84, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
31
- Cumberland Law Review, 2008, v. 39, n. 3, p. 749
- Norton, Anne Belle Wilder
- Article
32
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2005, v. 10, n. 2, p. 159
- Article
33
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2005, v. 10, n. 2, p. 159
- Article
35
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1990, v. 53, n. 3, p. 177, doi. 10.2307/1191796
- Article
36
- Journal of International Media & Entertainment Law, 2012, v. 4, n. 2, p. 111
- Article
37
- UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 329, doi. 10.5070/lr8192027156
- Article
38
- SMU Law Review, 2023, v. 76, n. 4, p. 975, doi. 10.25172/smulr.76.4.8
- Article
39
- St. John's Law Review, 2021, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1073
- Article
40
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2010, v. 54, n. 4, p. 817
- Article
41
- Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 2009, v. 39, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1080/10632920903218547
- Article
42
- Revista Telos, 2010, v. 12, n. 2, p. 141
- Logreira Rivas, Carmen Isabel;
- Fuentes Pinzón, Fernando José
- Article
43
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2011, v. 18, n. 2, p. 551
- Article
44
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
46
- American Business Law Journal, 2015, v. 52, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.1111/ablj.12047
- McKelvey, Steve;
- Sliffman, Ari J.
- Article
47
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 325
- Article
50
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 339
- Article