Works matching DE "LEGAL realism"
1
- Contemporary Social Sciences, 2025, v. 10, n. 2, p. 138, doi. 10.19873/j.cnki.2096-0212.2025.02.009
- Article
2
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.149
- Article
3
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.129
- Article
4
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.113
- Article
6
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.1
- Article
7
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.77
- Article
8
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.33
- Article
9
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.7
- Article
10
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.187
- Article
12
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2013, v. 1, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.5235/2050-8840.1.1.59
- Article
13
- Stance (1943-1880), 2016, v. 9, p. 27
- Article
14
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2019, v. 64, n. 4, p. 479, doi. 10.1177/0003603X19875036
- Article
15
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 65, n. 2, p. 303
- Delgado, Richard;
- Stefancic, Jean
- Article
16
- New York Law School Law Review, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 659
- Article
17
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 5, p. 1433
- Article
18
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 949
- Article
20
- Denver Law Review, 2020, v. 97, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
21
- Legal Theory, 2022, v. 28, n. 3, p. 235, doi. 10.1017/S1352325222000131
- Plunkett, David;
- Wodak, Daniel
- Article
22
- Legal Theory, 2013, v. 19, n. 3, p. 282, doi. 10.1017/S1352325213000128
- Article
23
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2019, v. 44, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1353/sch.2019.0020
- Article
25
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 3, p. 265, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.3.265
- Article
26
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2020, v. 24, n. 3, p. 395
- Article
28
- Modern Judaism: A Journal of Jewish Ideas & Experience, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1093/mj/kju010
- Article
29
- Philosophy Compass, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 447, doi. 10.1111/phc3.12034
- Article
30
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
32
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, v. 63, n. 3, p. 747, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2015.0021
- Article
33
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, v. 63, n. 1, p. 155, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2015.0005
- Article
34
- Ratio Juris, 2017, v. 30, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1111/raju.12073
- Article
35
- Ratio Juris, 2017, v. 30, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1111/raju.12137
- Fittipaldi, Edoardo;
- Timoshina, Elena
- Article
36
- Ratio Juris, 2016, v. 29, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1111/raju.12071
- Article
37
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 3, p. 364, doi. 10.1111/raju.12049
- Article
38
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2018, v. 69, n. 2, p. 275
- Article
39
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 869
- Article
40
- Vniversitas, 2012, n. 125, p. 121
- Buchely Ibarra, Lina Fernanda
- Article
41
- San Diego Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
42
- San Diego Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
43
- Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1203
- BREEN, JOHN M.;
- STRANG, LEE J.
- Article
44
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2018, v. 38, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqy001
- Article
45
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, v. 34, n. 1, p. 155, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqt027
- Article
46
- Journal Jurisprudence, 2016, v. 30, p. 59
- Article
47
- Canadian Journal of Family Law / Revue Canadienne de Droit Familial, 2019, v. 32, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
48
- Southwestern Lore, 2014, v. 80, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
49
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2023, v. 34, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
50
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2015, v. 27, n. 1, p. 157
- Article