TO THE RIGHT TO INTIMACY AND BEYOND: A CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT FOR THE RIGHT TO SEX IN MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 4, p. 621
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "LAWRENCE v. Texas"
Results: 133
1
2
Dignitary Harms and Abortion Law.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2022, v. 22, n. 8, p. 85, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Perspectives on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Family Law.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 3, p. 361, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12352
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Equality with Exceptions? Recovering Lawrence's Central Holding.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1337
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
PULLING AN OLD DUSTY WEAPON OUT OF THE DRAWER: THE RETURN OF MORALITY POLICE POWERS TO REGULATE UNWANTED HOME-BASED BUSINESSES.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2012, v. 81, n. 1, p. 231
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Law Review Symposium 2014 -- Keynote by Erwin Chemerinsky.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 447
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Constitutional Crossroads and the Canon of Rational Basis Review.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 527
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
QUEER EYE FOR THE MILITARY GUY: WILL "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" SURVIVE IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS?
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2004, v. 78, n. 3, p. 897
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
AND THEN THERE WERE NONE: THE REPEAL OF SODOMY LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CUSTODY AND VISITATION RIGHTS OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS.
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2004, v. 78, n. 2, p. 397
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Falling through the Cracks: Queer Theory, Same-Sex Marriage, Lawrence v Texas, and Liminal Bodies.
- Published in:
- disClosure, 2011, v. 20, p. 24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India: decriminalising India's sodomy law.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2020, v. 24, n. 8, p. 1011, doi. 10.1080/13642987.2019.1690465
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Privacy without the Closet.
- Published in:
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2003, v. 50, n. 4, p. 5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
The Impact of Obergefell: Traditional Marriage's New Lease on Life?
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2016, v. 30, n. 2, p. 251
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Hints, not Holdings: Use of Precedent in Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2004, v. 18, n. 2, p. 681
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
What is Deeply Rooted in the Constitution?
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2024, v. 50, n. 2, p. 265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
RECONCILING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS WITH "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL": THE VALUE OF THE Cook V. GATES INIERMEDIATE-DEFERENTIAL APPROACH.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 237
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
MY BODY IS MY TEMPLE: UTILIZING THE CONCEPT OF DIGNITY IN SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE TO FIGHT SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECOGNITION OF LEGAL SEX.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
18
RECOGNIZING "X": A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CALIFORNIA GENDER RECOGNITION ACT--IDENTIFYING THE LIMITATIONS AND CONCEPTUALIZING POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS.
- Published in:
- California Western Law Review, 2018, v. 55, n. 1, p. 315
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
EQUAL DIGNITY, COLORBLINDNESS, AND THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BEYOND GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
PATERNALISM, TOLERANCE, AND ACCEPTANCE: MODELING THE EVOLUTION OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL CANON.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 5, p. 1615
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
WRITING ON, AROUND, AND THROUGH LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2005, v. 38, n. 2, p. 493
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE RIGHT DECISION FOR THE WRONG REASON: THE SUPREME COURT CORRECTLY INVALIDATES THE TEXAS HOMOSEXUAL SODOMY STATUTE, BUT RATHER THAN FINDING AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION IN <em>LAWRENCE V. TEXAS</em>, THE COURT INCORRECTLY AND UNNECESSARILY OVERRULES <em>BOWERS V. HARDWICK</em>
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 37, n. 3, p. 653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
The Procedural Queer: Substantive Due Process, Lawrence v. Texas , and Queer Rhetorical Futures.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
24
A “CHARTER OF NEGATIVE LIBERTIES” NO LONGER: EQUAL DIGNITY AND THE POSITIVE RIGHT TO EDUCATION.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 2, p. 835
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
SEXUAL CONSENT AND DISABILITY.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 3, p. 480
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
RELIANCE BY WHOM? THE FALSE PROMISE OF SOCIETAL RELIANCE IN STARE DECISIS ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 6, p. 2094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
DUE PROCESS DISESTABLISHMENT: WHY LAWRENCE V. TEXAS IS A FIRST AMENDMENT CASE.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2016, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1794
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
THE GLUCKSBERG RENAISSANCE: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS SINCE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2006, v. 105, n. 2, p. 409
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
BROWN AND LAWRENCE (AND GOODRIDGE).
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2005, v. 104, n. 3, p. 431
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
SURVIVING LAWRENCE v. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1615, doi. 10.2307/4141915
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND JUDICIAL HUBRIS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1555, doi. 10.2307/4141914
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE PARADOX OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1528, doi. 10.2307/4141913
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
THE UNKNOWN PAST OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1464, doi. 10.2307/4141912
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
FOREWORD: LOVING LAWRENCE.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1447
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
УТИЦАЈ СУДСКЕ ПРАКСЕ НА ЗАКОНСКУ РЕГУЛАТИВУ У ОБЛАСТИ ПРАВА ЛГБТ ЗАЈЕДНИЦЕ
- Published in:
- Socioloski Pregled, 2021, v. 55, n. 3, p. 690, doi. 10.5937/socpreg55-32553
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
THE CRIMINALIZATION OF CONSENSUAL ADULT SEX AFTER LAWRENCE.
- Published in:
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
THE KENNEDY DOCTRINE: MORAL DISAGREEMENT AND THE "BARE DESIRE TO HARM".
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 949
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, FEDERALISM, AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
UNDERSTANDING UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR AND THE SYMPOSIUM CONTRIBUTIONS USING UNIDIRECTIONAL AND BIDIRECTIONAL MODELS OF SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, FEDERALISM, AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 1119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
HUMAN DIGNITY IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS: PRINCIPLES OF APPLICATION AND THE RULE OF LAW.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2017, v. 25, n. 3, p. 435
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
How State Courts Apply Lawrence v. Texas in Civil Contexts: A Mixed-Methods Content Analysis of Two Decades of Cases.
- Published in:
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2023, v. 32, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
North Carolina Courts: Legislating Compulsory Heterosexuality by Creating New Crimes Under the Crime Against Nature Statute Post-Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2011, v. 20, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
In Memoriam: John G. Lawrence.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Obituary
45
Legal Challenges after Lawrence.
- Published in:
- Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, 2003, v. 10, n. 6, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Timing of Henry VIII's sodomy law matters.
- Published in:
- 2004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter
47
Case against Marriage Equality Implodes.
- Published in:
- 2003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
48
Lawrence v. Texas: A Victory for Liberty.
- Published in:
- 2003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
49
SEXUAL PRIVACY IN THE MODERN ERA: LOWE V. SWANSON.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 3, p. 1127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
PRESERVING AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY: THE PROPER PLACE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN INTERPRETING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Regent Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 8, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article