Works matching DE "LAW %26 feminism"
4
- Journal of Law & Society, 2001, v. 28, n. 4, p. 546, doi. 10.1111/1467-6478.00202
- Article
5
- Journal of Law & Society, 2000, v. 27, n. 3, p. 351, doi. 10.1111/1467-6478.00159
- Article
6
- Peabody Journal of Education (0161956X), 1984, v. 61, n. 3, p. 111, doi. 10.1080/01619568409538448
- Article
7
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2003, v. 20, n. 2, p. 399, doi. 10.1080/07418820300095571
- Article
8
- Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu, 2010, v. 53, p. 31
- Article
9
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1065
- Article
10
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2024, v. 22, n. 4, p. 929, doi. 10.1093/icon/moae089
- Article
11
- Women's Studies in Communication, 2012, v. 35, n. 2, p. 123, doi. 10.1080/07491409.2012.724526
- Article
12
- Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, 2010, n. 21, p. 11
- Aquino De Souza, Cristiane
- Article
13
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 1997, v. 11, n. 2, p. 255
- Walker, Sherrine M.;
- Wall, Christopher D.
- Article
14
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2019, v. 28, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
15
- Ius et Praxis (07172877), 2013, v. 19, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
16
- eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
17
- William & Mary Law Review, 1999, v. 40, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
18
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 23, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.3366/elr.2019.0523
- Article
19
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 3, p. 985
- Article
20
- Law & Philosophy, 1983, v. 2, n. 2, p. 266
- Article
21
- Hypatia, 2003, v. 18, n. 4, p. 214, doi. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb01419.x
- Article
22
- Direito e Práxis, 2019, v. 10, n. 2, p. 962, doi. 10.1590/2179-8966/2018/32195
- Hein de Campos, Carmen;
- Severi, Fabiana Cristina
- Article
23
- Feminists@law, 2018, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
24
- Feminists@law, 2014, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2014, v. 5, n. 4, p. 640, doi. 10.5235/20414005.5.4.640
- Article
29
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 359, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.24.2.359
- Article
30
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 389, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389
- Article
31
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 275, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.24.2.275
- Article
32
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2009, v. 21, n. 1, p. 177, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.21.1.177
- Article
33
- Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2009, v. 21, n. 1, p. 19, doi. 10.3138/cjwl.21.1.19
- Article
34
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 379, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.379
- Article
35
- Michigan Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 32, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
36
- Adelaide Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
38
- Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry / Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2017, v. 39, n. 3, p. 271, doi. 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2046
- Article
44
- Security Studies, 2009, v. 18, n. 2, p. 319, doi. 10.1080/09636410902900020
- Article
46
- Griffith Law Review, 2023, v. 32, n. 3, p. 335, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2024.2309106
- Article
47
- Griffith Law Review, 2020, v. 29, n. 3, p. 451, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2020.1903666
- Article
49
- Griffith Law Review, 2012, v. 21, n. 3, p. 752, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2012.10854761
- Article
50
- Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 2016, v. 118, n. 4, p. 563
- Article