Works matching DE "LAW %26 fact"
1
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. 269, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12404
- Article
2
- Modern Law Review, 1998, v. 61, n. 6, p. 886, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.00184
- Article
3
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1185
- Article
4
- Utah Bar Journal, 2011, v. 24, n. 1, p. 8
- Jackson, Norman H.;
- Thornton, Lisa Broderick
- Article
5
- Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, 2010, v. 7, p. 87
- Kiernan-Johnson, Derek H.
- Article
6
- McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 2014, v. 10, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
7
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 57
- Article
8
- Liverpool Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1007/s10991-013-9144-x
- Shaw, Julia;
- Shaw, Hillary
- Article
9
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2016, v. 22, n. 2, p. 471
- Article
10
- Critical Horizons, 2006, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- California Law Review, 1927, v. 15, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.2307/3475967
- Article
12
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2023, v. 48, n. 7, p. 2281
- Article
13
- Arbitration Journal, 1978, v. 33, n. 3, p. 56
- Article
14
- American Economic Review, 1953, v. 43, n. 5, p. 846
- Article
15
- George Mason Law Review, 2024, v. 31, n. 2, p. 541
- Article
16
- George Mason Law Review, 2024, v. 31, n. 2, p. 499
- Article
17
- Journal of Tax Practice & Procedure, 2018, v. 20, n. 6, p. 5
- Article
18
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 86, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
19
- Ius et Praxis (07172877), 2008, v. 14, n. 2, p. 43
- Article
20
- University of British Columbia Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 2, p. 345
- Article
21
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007, v. 4, n. 3, p. 539, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00099.x
- Eisenberg, Theodore;
- Miller, Geoffrey P.
- Article
22
- William & Mary Law Review, 2001, v. 43, n. 1, p. 325
- Article
23
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 345
- Article
24
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1600
- Article
25
- Law & Society Review, 1971, v. 6, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.2307/3052915
- Article
26
- Asian Journal of Law & Society, 2020, v. 7, n. 3, p. 531, doi. 10.1017/als.2020.33
- Article
27
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2000, v. 50, n. 3, p. 797
- Article
29
- Review of Litigation, 2014, v. 33, n. 3, p. 469
- Article
30
- 2003
- Allen, Ronald J.;
- Pardo, Michael S.
- Essay
31
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 899
- Article
32
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2020, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2019.28
- Article
33
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
34
- Iowa Law Review, 2019, v. 104, n. 5, p. 2387
- Article
35
- 2014
- Blume, John H.;
- Helm, Rebecca K.
- Essay
36
- Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
38
- Chicago Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 18, n. 1, p. 83
- Article
39
- Interfaces, 1976, v. 6, n. 3, p. 132
- Gelfand, Alan E.;
- Solomon, Herbert
- Article
40
- Legal Theory, 2009, v. 15, n. 3, p. 173, doi. 10.1017/S1352325209990024
- Article
41
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2014, n. 1, p. 154
- Article
42
- Columbia Law Review, 2004, v. 104, n. 8, p. 2291, doi. 10.2307/4099360
- Article
43
- Memoria Ethnologica, 2016, v. 16, n. 60/61, p. 146
- Article
44
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2009, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.7590/real_2009_01_03
- Article
45
- Slovenian Law Review, 2006, v. 3, n. 1/2, p. 125
- Article
46
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2019, v. 42, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.29173/mlj1108
- Article
47
- Florida Bar Journal, 2005, v. 79, n. 10, p. 38
- Article
48
- Arbitration International, 2009, v. 25, n. 2, p. 217, doi. 10.1093/arbitration/25.2.217
- Article
49
- Arbitration International, 2009, v. 25, n. 2, p. 207
- Article
50
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1930, v. 21, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.2307/1134322
- Article