Works matching DE "LAW %26 art"
1
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
2
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 141
- Article
3
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 319
- Article
4
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 459
- Article
5
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 393
- Article
6
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 321
- Article
7
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 29, n. 1, p. 83
- Article
9
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2004, v. 28, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
10
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2020, v. 34, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2020.1733765
- Article
11
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2017, v. 31, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2017.1275273
- Zatarain, Jesus Manuel Niebla
- Article
12
- Santander Art & Culture Law Review, 2021, n. 2, p. 51, doi. 10.4467/2450050XSNR.21.018.15263
- Vilá, Claudia S. Quiñones
- Article
13
- Revista Română de Drept al Afacerilor, 2013, n. 12, p. 25
- HAROSA, Liviu-Marius;
- MOCANU, Mihaela
- Article
14
- ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 2005, v. 59, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1093/elt/cci017
- Article
16
- Afterimage, 2011, v. 39, n. 3, p. 13, doi. 10.1525/aft.2011.39.3.13
- Article
17
- Afterimage, 2004, v. 31, n. 4, p. 4, doi. 10.1525/aft.2004.31.4.4
- Article
19
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2018, p. 167
- Article
20
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2015, n. 96, p. 167
- Article
21
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2015, n. 92, p. 175
- Article
22
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2014, n. 91, p. 29
- Article
23
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2014, n. 88, p. 191
- Article
24
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2013, n. 86, p. 167
- Article
25
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2013, n. 83, p. 152
- Article
26
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2012, n. 80, p. 167
- Article
27
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2011, n. 76, p. 143
- Article
28
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2010, n. 69, p. 39
- Article
29
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2008, n. 57, p. 88
- Article
30
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2007, n. 55, p. 86
- Article
31
- ArtAsiaPacific, 2005, n. 44, p. 22
- Article
32
- Journal of Field Archaeology, 1987, v. 14, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
33
- Journal of Field Archaeology, 1987, v. 14, n. 2, p. 221
- Article
34
- Journal of Field Archaeology, 1987, v. 14, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
35
- Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, 2010, v. 9, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1017/S1537781400003789
- Article
38
- Journal of Glass Studies, 2014, v. 56, p. 189
- Article
39
- St. John's Law Review, 2021, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1073
- Article
40
- St. John's Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
41
- Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
42
- Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1055
- Article
43
- Liverpool Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1007/s10991-013-9145-9
- Article
44
- Journal of Cultural Economics, 2011, v. 35, n. 2, p. 81, doi. 10.1007/s10824-010-9134-y
- Banternghansa, Chanont;
- Graddy, Kathryn
- Article
45
- Journal of Academic Studies, 2006, v. 8, n. 30, p. 137
- Article
46
- Pólemos (2035-5262), 2018, v. 12, n. 2, p. 449, doi. 10.1515/pol-2018-0025
- Ribeiro, Fernando Armando
- Article
47
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2005, v. 13, n. 3, p. 243
- Article
48
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 5, p. 1147
- Article
49
- Hermeneia: Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory & Criticism, 2012, n. 12, p. 270
- Article