Works matching DE "KING v. Burwell"
1
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
2
- Florida Tax Review, 2017, v. 20, n. 9, p. 551
- Article
3
- AMA Journal of Ethics, 2015, v. 17, n. 10, p. 938, doi. 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.10.hlaw1-1510
- Klusty, Tobin;
- Bi, Stephanie
- Article
4
- Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics & Policy, 2016, v. 83, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
5
- Kansas Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 3, p. 663
- Article
6
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1933
- Article
8
- Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 2016, v. 32, n. 1, p. 231
- Article
9
- 2015
- Gostin, Lawrence O.;
- DeBartolo, Mary C.;
- Hougendobler, Daniel A.
- Opinion
10
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2015, v. 313, n. 18, p. 1785, doi. 10.1001/jama.2015.3316
- Article
12
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. vii
- Article
13
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. 1
- Article
14
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. 79
- Article
15
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. 35
- Adler, Jonathan H.;
- Cannon, Michael F.
- Article
16
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 1, p. 349
- Article
17
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 671
- Article
18
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 509
- Article
19
- Iowa Law Review, 2019, v. 105, n. 1, p. 283
- Article
20
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 7, p. 16
- Article
21
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 8, p. 48
- Article
22
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 8, p. 35
- Article
23
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2019
- Article
24
- Marquette Law Review, 2019, v. 103, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
25
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 4, p. 576, doi. 10.1177/1073110516684789
- Article
26
- Administrative Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 3, p. 445
- Article
27
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1095
- Article
28
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
29
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 857
- Article
30
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
31
- Public Health Reports, 2015, v. 130, n. 6, p. 731, doi. 10.1177/003335491513000622
- Article
32
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2016, v. 110, n. 4, p. 811
- Article
33
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1143
- Article
34
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 777
- Coenen, Michael;
- Davis, Seth
- Article
35
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 1143
- Article
36
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 777
- Coenen, Michael;
- Davis, Seth
- Article
37
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2018, v. 53, n. 1, p. 37
- Article
38
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
39
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
41
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 249
- Jost, Timothy Stoltzfus;
- Engstrand, James
- Article
42
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 267
- Article
43
- Journal of Taxation of Investments, 2015, v. 33, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
44
- Boston College Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1
- HUBERFELD, NICOLE;
- ROBERTS, JESSICA L.
- Article
45
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
46
- Benefits Quarterly, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 55
- Article
47
- Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
48
- Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
49
- Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 129
- Article
50
- Labor Law Journal, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 187
- Article